Surveillance in Barrett's esophagus: lessons from behavioral economics.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Decision aids for shared decision-making in Barrett's esophagus surveillance.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2015
   Article
2. Endoscopic Imaging in Barrett's Oesophagus: Applications in Routine Clinical Practice and Future Outlook.Clinical endoscopy · 2011
   Article
3. Patients' intuitive judgments about surveillance endoscopy in Barrett's esophagus: a review and application to models of decision-making.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as