Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19642207›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council

Impact of BRCA mutations on female fertility and offspring sex ratio.

Roxana Moslehi, Ranjana Singh, Lawrence Lessner, Jan M Friedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Impact of BRCA1- and BRCA2 Mutations on Ovarian Reserve Status.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Antagonistic Pleiotropy in Human Disease.Journal of molecular evolution · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Roxana MoslehiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, State University of New York at Albany, 1 Discovery Drive, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA. rmoslehi@albany.edu
Ranjana Singh
Lawrence Lessner
Jan M Friedman
University at Albany, State University of New York · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Developmental Infrastructure CoreR24HD044943 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI DENTON, NANCY A · 2004 to 2016
$4.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD044943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positive selection for inherited mutations in breast and ovarian cancer predisposing genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, may contribute to the high frequency of BRCA mutations among the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Impact of BRCA mutations on fertility has not been generally explored in epidemiologic studies. There are reports of distorted sex ratios in BRCA carrier families but these findings have been attributed to bias. We investigated the effect of BRCA mutations on female fertility and offspring sex ratio in a study of 260 Ashkenazi Jewish women with ovarian cancer and 331 controls, unselected for age or family history of the disease. Pregnancy success was similar for 96 mutation carrier (0.84) and 164 noncarrier cases (0.87) and controls (0.83). After adjusting for covariates, there were no significant differences between BRCA carrier and noncarrier cases and controls with regards to fertility, despite lower pregnancy rates among all cases compared to controls (P = 0.0049). Male/female sex ratios were significantly lower among offspring of carriers (0.71) than offspring of noncarriers (0.95) or those of the controls (0.99). Comparisons among the three groups yielded statistically significant distortion against males among the offspring of known and obligate BRCA carriers compared to noncarriers (OR = 0.74, 95% CI:0.55-0.99) and controls (OR = 0.71, 95% CI:0.54-0.94). In conclusion, we did not find evidence for an effect of BRCA mutations on female fertility. We found a significant excess of females among the offspring of female carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Potential contribution of observed sex ratio distortions to positive selection for BRCA mutations may warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

Birth RateGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Sex RatioAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleFertilityHeterozygoteHumansJewsMaleMiddle AgedMutationOvarian Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID19642207
PMCPMC3739697
OpenAlexW2167942824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.