Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19642137›Full record

ArticleLiver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society2009

Proliferative alloresponse of T-cytotoxic cells identifies rejection-prone children with steroid-free liver transplantation.

Chethan Ashokkumar, Qing Sun, Ankit Gupta, Brandon W Higgs, Tamara Fazzolare, Lisa Remaley, George Mazariegos, Kyle Soltys, Geoffrey Bond, Rakesh Sindhi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chethan AshokkumarHillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Qing Sun
Ankit Gupta
Brandon W Higgs
Tamara Fazzolare
Lisa Remaley
George Mazariegos
Kyle Soltys
Geoffrey Bond
Rakesh Sindhi
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USPittsburg State University · US

Funding

Predictors for drug selection and minimization in pediatric liver transplantationR01AI073895 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SINDHI, RAKESH K. · 2006 to 2009
$1.5M
Pharmacodynamic Thresholds of ImmunosuppressionR01AI049156 · NIAID · CHILDREN'S HOSP PITTSBURGH/UPMC HLTH SYS · PI SINDHI, RAKESH K. · 2001 to 2004
$943k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049156NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Donor-induced and third-party-induced proliferation of T-helper and T-cytotoxic (Tc) cells and their naïve and memory subsets was evaluated simultaneously in single blood samples from 77 children who received steroid-free liver transplantation (LTx) after induction with rabbit anti-human thymocyte globulin. Proliferation was measured by dilution of the intravital dye carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) in a 3- to 4-day mixed lymphocyte response coculture. The ratio of donor/third-party-induced proliferated (CFSE(low)) T-cells was reported as the immunoreactivity index (IR) for each subset. Rejectors were defined as those who experienced biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection within 60 days of the assay. IR > 1 signified increased risk of rejection, and IR < 1 implied decreased risk. Demographics for 32 rejectors and 45 nonrejectors were similar. Proliferated CFSE(low) T-cells and subsets were significantly higher among rejectors compared with nonrejectors. In 33 of 77 randomly selected children, logistic regression, leave-one-out cross-validation, and receiver operating characteristic analyses showed that the IR of Tc cells was best associated with biopsy-proven rejection (sensitivity > 75%, specificity > 88%). Sensitivity and specificity were replicated in the remaining 44 children who composed the validation cohort. IR of CFSE(low) Tc cells correlated significantly with IR of proinflammatory, allospecific CD154+ Tc cells (r = 0.664, P = 0.0005) and inversely with IR of allospecific, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4-positive Tc cells (r = -0.630, P = 0.007). In conclusion, proliferative alloresponses of Tc cells can identify rejection-prone children receiving LTx. Liver Transpl 15:978-985, 2009. (c) 2009 AASLD.

Indexed as

BiopsyCell ProliferationChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFluoresceinsFluorescent DyesGraft RejectionHumansLiver TransplantationMaleRiskSteroidsSuccinimidesT-LymphocytesT-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic5-(6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl esterFluoresceinsFluorescent DyesSteroidsSuccinimides

Identifiers

PMID19642137
PMCPMC2997467
OpenAlexW2043451390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.