Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19641913›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2009

Successful strategy to improve the specificity of electronic statin-drug interaction alerts.

Hanna Marita Seidling, Caroline Henrike Storch, Thilo Bertsche, Christian Senger, Jens Kaltschmidt, Ingeborg Walter-Sack, Walter Emil Haefeli

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanna Marita SeidlingDepartment of Internal Medicine VI, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Caroline Henrike Storch
Thilo Bertsche
Christian Senger
Jens Kaltschmidt
Ingeborg Walter-Sack
Walter Emil Haefeli
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA considerable weakness of current clinical decision support systems managing drug-drug interactions (DDI) is the high incidence of inappropriate alerts. Because DDI-induced, dose-dependent adverse events can be prevented by dosage adjustment, corresponding DDI alerts should only be issued if dosages exceed safe limits. We have designed a logical framework for a DDI alert-system that considers prescribed dosage and retrospectively evaluates the impact on the frequency of statin-drug interaction alerts.

methodsUpper statin dose limits were extracted from the drug label (SPC) (20 statin-drug combinations) or clinical trials specifying the extent of the pharmacokinetic interaction (43 statin-drug combinations). We retrospectively assessed electronic DDI alerts and compared the number of standard alerts to alerts that took dosage into account.

resultsFrom among 2457 electronic prescriptions, we identified 73 high-risk statin-drug pairs. Of these, SPC dosage information classified 19 warnings as inappropriate. Data from pharmacokinetic trials took quantitative dosage information more often into consideration and classified 40 warnings as inappropriate. This is a significant reduction in the number of alerts by 55% compared to SPC-based information (26%; p < 0.001).

conclusionThis retrospective study of pharmacokinetic statin interactions demonstrates that more than half of the DDI alerts that presented in a clinical decision support system were inappropriate if DDI-specific upper dose limits are not considered.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalDrug InteractionsMedical Order Entry SystemsDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMedication ErrorsRetrospective StudiesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID19641913
OpenAlexW1968835178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.