Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19641688›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical cardiology2005

A common mechanism in the protective effects of preconditioning, cardiac pacing and physical exercise against ischemia and reperfusion-induced arrhythmias.

Agnes Végh, James R Parratt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical cardiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Why Does Exercise "Trigger" Adaptive Protective Responses in the Heart?Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Agnes VéghDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Albert Szent Györgyi Medical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
James R Parratt
University of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic preconditioning results not only in a reduction in myocardial ischemic damage, but also in a marked suppression of those ventricular arrhythmias that result from a more prolonged period of ischemia and reperfusion insult. This protection is time-dependent and occurs in two distinct phases. There is an 'early phase' which is apparent immediately after the preconditioning stimulus but fades quickly (within 1 h to 2 h), and a 'delayed protection phase' in which the antiarrhythmic protection reappears 20 h to 24 h later. In both phases, the intensity of protection largely depends on the nature of the preconditioning stimulus. This can be ischemia resulting from brief coronary artery occlusions, cardiac pacing or vigorous physical exercise. Both cardiac pacing and exercise results in a marked reduction in the incidence and severity of ischemia and reperfusion-induced ventricular arrhythmias 24 h later. Although the precise mechanisms of the delayed protection that results from cardiac pacing and exercise are not yet fully understood, there is some evidence that similar endogenous protective substances (such as bradykinin, prostanoids and nitric oxide), as with ischemic preconditioning, play a pivotal trigger and mediator role in this anti-arrhythmic protection.

Indexed as

Cardiac pacingExerciseIschemiaPreconditioningVentricular arrhythmias

Identifiers

PMID19641688
PMCPMC2716252
OpenAlexW1534395207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.