ArticleExperimental and clinical cardiology2005
A common mechanism in the protective effects of preconditioning, cardiac pacing and physical exercise against ischemia and reperfusion-induced arrhythmias.
Article in Experimental and clinical cardiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Why Does Exercise "Trigger" Adaptive Protective Responses in the Heart?Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic preconditioning results not only in a reduction in myocardial ischemic damage, but also in a marked suppression of those ventricular arrhythmias that result from a more prolonged period of ischemia and reperfusion insult. This protection is time-dependent and occurs in two distinct phases. There is an 'early phase' which is apparent immediately after the preconditioning stimulus but fades quickly (within 1 h to 2 h), and a 'delayed protection phase' in which the antiarrhythmic protection reappears 20 h to 24 h later. In both phases, the intensity of protection largely depends on the nature of the preconditioning stimulus. This can be ischemia resulting from brief coronary artery occlusions, cardiac pacing or vigorous physical exercise. Both cardiac pacing and exercise results in a marked reduction in the incidence and severity of ischemia and reperfusion-induced ventricular arrhythmias 24 h later. Although the precise mechanisms of the delayed protection that results from cardiac pacing and exercise are not yet fully understood, there is some evidence that similar endogenous protective substances (such as bradykinin, prostanoids and nitric oxide), as with ischemic preconditioning, play a pivotal trigger and mediator role in this anti-arrhythmic protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19641688PMC2716252W1534395207What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.