ArticleMolecular vision2009
MLGA: a cost-effective approach to the diagnosis of gene deletions in eye development anomalies.
Article in Molecular vision, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whole gene deletions or duplications are an important cause of genetic disease and phenotypic variation. Targeted techniques for the routine testing of gross rearrangements have become essential tools for diagnostic researchers with the search for the most cost-effective and efficient tool assuming high priority. We used the new selector technique, MLGA (multiplex ligation-dependent genome amplification), to confirm deletions in two genes, SOX2 (SRY [sex determining region Y]) box 2) and OTX2 (orthodenticle homeobox 2), in individuals with developmental eye disease. We conclude that MLGA has the potential to be a useful technique in diagnostic research for the identification of deletions or duplications of known genes due to its speed and relatively low cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19641633PMC2716932W131016356What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.