Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19641523›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2009

Chronic myeloproliferative diseases with and without the Ph chromosome: some unresolved issues.

J M Goldman, A R Green, T Holyoake, C Jamieson, R Mesa, T Mughal, F Pellicano, D Perrotti, R Skoda, A M Vannucchi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stem cell quiescence.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2011
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Awakening dormant haematopoietic stem cells.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

J M GoldmanDepartment of Haematology, Imperial College at Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, UK. jgoldman@imperial.ac.uk
A R Green
T Holyoake
C Jamieson
R Mesa
T Mughal
F Pellicano
D Perrotti
R Skoda
A M Vannucchi
University of Glasgow · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBGuy's Hospital · GBHammersmith Hospital · GBMayo Clinic in Arizona · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ph-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Ph-negative chronic myeloproliferative diseases (MPDs), characterized in many cases by the presence of the JAK2(V617F) mutation, have many features in common and yet also show fundamental differences. In this review, we pose five discrete and related questions relevant to both categories of hematological malignancy, namely: What are the mechanisms that underlie disease progression from a relatively benign or chronic phase? By what therapeutic methods might one target residual leukemia stem cells in CML? Is JAK2(V617F) the original molecular event in MPD? What epigenetic events must have a role in dictating disease phenotype in MPDs? And finally, Will the benefits conferred by current or future JAK2(V617F) inhibitors equal or even surpass the clinical success that has resulted from the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in CML? These and others questions must be addressed and in some cases should be answered in the foreseeable future.

Indexed as

Philadelphia ChromosomeChronic DiseaseHumansJanus Kinase 2Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-PhaseMyeloproliferative DisordersJAK2 protein, humanJanus Kinase 2

Identifiers

PMID19641523
OpenAlexW2042925579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.