Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19640299›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009

CLEAN: CLustering Enrichment ANalysis.

Johannes M Freudenberg, Vineet K Joshi, Zhen Hu, Mario Medvedovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ALOHA: Aggregated local extrema splines for high-throughput dose-response analysis.Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Organoid-Based Preclinical Model of Human Gastric Cancer.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johannes M FreudenbergLaboratory for Statistical Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3223 Eden Av, ML 56, Cincinnati OH 45267-0056, USA. freudejm@uc.edu
Vineet K Joshi
Zhen Hu
Mario Medvedovic

Funding

REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY RESEARCHP30ES006096 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI YADAV, JAGJIT S · 1992 to 2022
$35.4M
Bayesian Mixture Modeling of Functional Genomics DataR01HG003749 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MEDVEDOVIC, MARIO · 2006 to 2009
$1.4M
Integrative Probabilistic Models for Identifying Transcriptional ModulesR21LM009662 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MEDVEDOVIC, MARIO · 2008 to 2009
$374k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003749NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES006096NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES06096NLM NIH HHS R21 LM009662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegration of biological knowledge encoded in various lists of functionally related genes has become one of the most important aspects of analyzing genome-wide functional genomics data. In the context of cluster analysis, functional coherence of clusters established through such analyses have been used to identify biologically meaningful clusters, compare clustering algorithms and identify biological pathways associated with the biological process under investigation.

resultsWe developed a computational framework for analytically and visually integrating knowledge-based functional categories with the cluster analysis of genomics data. The framework is based on the simple, conceptually appealing, and biologically interpretable gene-specific functional coherence score (CLEAN score). The score is derived by correlating the clustering structure as a whole with functional categories of interest. We directly demonstrate that integrating biological knowledge in this way improves the reproducibility of conclusions derived from cluster analysis. The CLEAN score differentiates between the levels of functional coherence for genes within the same cluster based on their membership in enriched functional categories. We show that this aspect results in higher reproducibility across independent datasets and produces more informative genes for distinguishing different sample types than the scores based on the traditional cluster-wide analysis. We also demonstrate the utility of the CLEAN framework in comparing clusterings produced by different algorithms. CLEAN was implemented as an add-on R package and can be downloaded at http://Clusteranalysis.org. The package integrates routines for calculating gene specific functional coherence scores and the open source interactive Java-based viewer Functional TreeView (FTreeView).

conclusionOur results indicate that using the gene-specific functional coherence score improves the reproducibility of the conclusions made about clusters of co-expressed genes over using the traditional cluster-wide scores. Using gene-specific coherence scores also simplifies the comparisons of clusterings produced by different clustering algorithms and provides a simple tool for selecting genes with a "functionally coherent" expression profile.

Indexed as

GenomicsAlgorithmsAnimalsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingHumansMiceReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID19640299
PMCPMC2734555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.