Trial reportTrials2009
Clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in coronary heart disease: the CE-MARC study.
Trial report in Trials, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic and prognostic comparison of stress electrocardiogram, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and single photon emission computed tomography, alone and sequentially, in stable chest pain.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Trial
- Randomised trial of stable chest pain investigation: 3-year clinical and quality of life results from CE-MARC 2.Open heart · 2023Trial
- Factors associated with false-negative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion studies: A Clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in coronary artery disease (CE-MARC) substudy.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2016Trial
- Individual component analysis of the multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol in the CE-MARC trial.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2015Trial
- Considerations when measuring myocardial perfusion reserve by cardiovascular magnetic resonance using regadenoson.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2012Trial
- Association of exercise blood pressure relative to fitness with coronary artery disease.Open heart · 2026Article
- FOCUS-ischemia: A real-world comparison of an ischemia-focused analytical strategy and conventional multiparametric stress CMR.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- The Diagnostic and Prognostic Impact of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Ischemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging across PET, SPECT, CMR, and CT.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Review
- The Role of Multimodality Imaging (CT & MR) as a Guide to the Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Comparison of Stress-Rest and Stress-LGE Analysis Strategy in Patients Undergoing Stress Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- CMR is vital in the management of cardiology inpatients: a tertiary centre experience.The British journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Regional variation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance service delivery across the UK.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2021Article
- Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance: feasibility and development of biventricular function and great vessel flow assessment, during continuous exercise accelerated by Compressed SENSE: preliminary results in healthy volunteers.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance: development, current utility and future applications.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020Review
- Rapid dealiasing of undersampled, non-Cartesian cardiac perfusion images using U-net.NMR in biomedicine · 2020Article
- Accelerated, first-pass cardiac perfusion pulse sequence with radial k-space sampling, compressed sensing, and k-space weighted image contrast reconstruction tailored for visual analysis and quantification of myocardial blood flow.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
- Wideband myocardial perfusion pulse sequence for imaging patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
- A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2017Article
- Assessment of stable coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: Current and emerging techniques.World journal of cardiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral investigations are currently available to establish the diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD). Of these, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers the greatest information from a single test, allowing the assessment of myocardial function, perfusion, viability and coronary artery anatomy. However, data from large scale studies that prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric CMR for the detection of CHD in unselected populations are lacking, and there are few data on the performance of CMR compared with current diagnostic tests, its prognostic value and cost-effectiveness. METHODS/
designThis is a prospective diagnostic accuracy cohort study of 750 patients referred to a cardiologist with suspected CHD. Exercise tolerance testing (ETT) will be preformed if patients are physically able. Recruited patients will then undergo CMR and single photon emission tomography (SPECT) followed in all patients by invasive X-ray coronary angiography. The order of the CMR and SPECT tests will be randomised. The CMR study will comprise rest and adenosine stress perfusion, cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement and whole-heart MR coronary angiography. SPECT will use a gated stress/rest protocol. The primary objective of the study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CMR in detecting significant coronary stenosis, as defined by X-ray coronary angiography. Secondary objectives include an assessment of the prognostic value of CMR imaging, a comparison of its diagnostic accuracy against SPECT and ETT, and an assessment of cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The CE-MARC study is a prospective, diagnostic accuracy cohort study of 750 patients assessing the performance of a multi-parametric CMR study in detecting CHD using invasive X-ray coronary angiography as the reference standard and comparing it with ETT and SPECT.
trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN77246133.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.