Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19639448›Full record

ReviewOdontology2009

Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis.

Lisa R Amir, Vincent Everts, Antonius L J J Bronckers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Odontology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Two-Axis Continuous Distractor for Mandibular Reconstruction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. MiRNA-based "fitness score" to assess the individual response to diet, metabolism, and exercise.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Biomolecular phases in transverse palatal distraction: A review.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Histomorphometric Analysis of Radiation Damage in an Isogenic Murine Model of Distraction Osteogenesis.Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa R AmirDepartment of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam, and VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststr 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent Everts
Antonius L J J Bronckers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone has the capacity to regenerate in response to injury. During distraction osteogenesis, the renewal of bone is enhanced by gradual stretching of the soft connective tissues in the gap area between two separated bone segments. This procedure has received much clinical attention as a way to correct congenital growth retardation of bone tissue or to generate bone to fill skeletal defects. The process of bone regeneration involves a complex system of biological changes whereby mechanical stress is converted into a cascade of signals that activate cellular behavior resulting in (enhanced) formation of bone. Over the last decade, significant progress has been made in understanding the bone regeneration process during distraction osteogenesis. The mechanical and biological factors that are important for the success of the distraction treatment have been partially characterized and are discussed in this review.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBone RegenerationChondrogenesisHumansOsteogenesisOsteogenesis, DistractionStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.