Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19639351›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2010

The impact of reference pricing on switching behaviour and healthcare utilisation: the case of statins in Germany.

Tom Stargardt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
21.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Pharmaceutical pricing dynamics in an internal reference pricing system: evidence from changing drugs' reimbursements.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Introduction of therapeutic reference pricing in Slovenia and its economic consequences.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018
    Article
  6. The diffusion of generics after patent expiry in Germany.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. The impact of generic reference pricing in Italy, a decade on.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2013
    Article
  9. Could co-payments on drugs help to make EU health care systems less open to political influence?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tom StargardtInstitute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. Tom.Stargardt@helmholtz-muenchen.de
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper analyses (1) the impact of the inclusion of statins in the German reference pricing scheme in 2005 on the statin market, and (2) the effect of switching behaviour subsequent to the policy change on healthcare utilisation and costs. Patients with prescriptions for statins in 2004 were observed for 1 year before and 1 year after the policy change, which went into effect on 1 January 2005. Data on outpatient and inpatient visits, pharmaceutical consumption, and cost to the sickness fund were collected from a sickness fund with more than 5.8 million insured members in 2005. Compared to patients who were not affected by the policy change, patients treated previously with atorvastatin experienced higher non-adherence and increased discontinuation of treatment (P < 0.0001). Compared to patients who continued treatment with atorvastatin (non-switchers), patients who switched to another statin were hospitalised more often (P = 0.0439). However, difference-in-differences in hospitalisation due to coronary heart disease (P = 0.8751) and emergency visits (P = 0.5624) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Patients who switched more than once experienced a significant increase in hospital visits (P = 0.0061) and hospital visits due to cardiovascular disease (P = 0.0096) compared to non-switchers. Difference-in-differences in outpatient healthcare utilisation did not differ between non-switchers and switchers. Total savings resulting from the policy change ranged from <euro> 94.4 million to <euro> 108.7 million. Although manufacturers usually comply with reference pricing by reducing their retail prices to the reference price, regulators have to be aware of the consequences in cases where manufacturers react as in this situation.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPrescription FeesCommerceCost SavingsDecision MakingGermanyHealth BehaviorHealth Care CostsHealth ServicesHospitalizationHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsOutpatientsPatient ComplianceHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID19639351
OpenAlexW2078712977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.