Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19638621›Full record

ReviewBlood2009

How I treat ADA deficiency.

H Bobby Gaspar, Alessandro Aiuti, Fulvio Porta, Fabio Candotti, Michael S Hershfield, Luigi D Notarangelo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 212 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Clinical applications of gene therapy for rare diseases: A review.International journal of experimental pathology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

H Bobby GasparCentre for Immunodeficiency, Molecular Immunology Unit, University College London Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom. h.gaspar@ich.ucl.ac.uk
Alessandro Aiuti
Fulvio Porta
Fabio Candotti
Michael S Hershfield
Luigi D Notarangelo
Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center · USDuke Medical Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USOspedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi · ITUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

Gene Therapy Approaches for Primary ImmunodeficienciesZIAHG000122 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CANDOTTI, FABIO · 2009 to 2014
$6.5M
GENE THERAPY APPROACHES FOR PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCIESZ01HG000122 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CANDOTTI, FABIO · 1998 to 2008
$3.2M
Intramural NIH HHSTelethon TGT06A01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenosine deaminase deficiency is a disorder of purine metabolism leading to severe combined immunodeficiency (ADA-SCID). Without treatment, the condition is fatal and requires early intervention. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the major treatment for ADA-SCID, although survival following different donor sources varies considerably. Unlike other SCID forms, 2 other options are available for ADA-SCID: enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with pegylated bovine ADA, and autologous haematopoietic stem cell gene therapy (GT). Due to the rarity of the condition, the lack of large scale outcome studies, and availability of different treatments, guidance on treatment strategies is limited. We have reviewed the currently available evidence and together with our experience of managing this condition propose a consensus management strategy. Matched sibling donor transplants represent a successful treatment option with high survival rates and excellent immune recovery. Mismatched parental donor transplants have a poor survival outcome and should be avoided unless other treatments are unavailable. ERT and GT both show excellent survival, and therefore the choice between ERT, MUD transplant, or GT is difficult and dependent on several factors, including accessibility to the different modalities, response of patients to long-term ERT, and the attitudes of physicians and parents to the short- and potential long-term risks associated with different treatments.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAdenosine DeaminaseAnimalsCattleHumansSevere Combined ImmunodeficiencyAdenosine Deaminase

Identifiers

PMID19638621
PMCPMC2766674
OpenAlexW2086409978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.