Trial reportBMC health services research2009
Effect of response format for clinical vignettes on reporting quality of physician practice.
Trial report in BMC health services research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Health professionals' willingness to share responsibility and strengthen interprofessional collaboration: a cross-sectional survey.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Professional beliefs of physicians and allied health professionals and their willingness to promote health in primary care: a cross-sectional survey.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- A prospective survey on therapeutic inertia in psoriatic arthritis (OPTI'PsA).Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Vignette Research Methodology: An Essential Tool for Quality Improvement Collaboratives.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Variation in the Reported Management of Canine Prolapsed Nictitans Gland and Feline Herpetic Keratitis.Veterinary sciences · 2018Article
- Variation in severe postpartum hemorrhage management: A national vignette-based study.PloS one · 2018Article
- Variations in Postpartum Hemorrhage Management among Midwives: A National Vignette-Based Study.PloS one · 2016Article
- Staff and Institutional Factors Associated with Substandard Care in the Management of Postpartum Hemorrhage.PloS one · 2016Article
- Methods of Observing Variations in Physicians' Decisions: The Opportunities of Clinical Vignettes.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Review
- Assessing Complex Emergency Management with Clinical Case-Vignettes: A Validation Study.PloS one · 2015Article
- A survey of physical therapists' clinical practice patterns and adherence to clinical guidelines in the management of patients with whiplash associated disorders (WAD).The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2014Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical vignettes have been used widely to compare quality of clinical care and to assess variation in practice, but the effect of different response formats has not been extensively evaluated. Our objective was to compare three clinical vignette-based survey response formats - open-ended questionnaire (A), closed-ended (multiple-choice) questionnaire with deceptive response items mixed with correct items (B), and closed-ended questionnaire with only correct items (C) - in rheumatologists' pre-treatment assessment for tumor-necrosis-factor (TNF) blocker therapy.
methodsSTUDY
designProspective randomized study.
settingRheumatologists attending the 2004 French Society of Rheumatology meeting. Physicians were given a vignette describing the history of a fictitious woman with active rheumatoid arthritis, who was a candidate for therapy with TNF blocking agents, and then were randomized to receive questionnaire A, B, or C, each containing the same four questions but with different response formats, that asked about their pretreatment assessment. MEASUREMENTS: Long (recommended items) and short (mandatory items) checklists were developed for pretreatment assessment for TNF-blocker therapy, and scores were expressed on the basis of responses to questionnaires A, B, and C as the percentage of respondents correctly choosing explicit items on these checklists. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Comparison of the selected items using pairwise Chi-square tests with Bonferonni correction for variables with statistically significant differences.
resultsData for all surveys distributed (114 As, 118 Bs, and 118 Cs) were complete and available for analysis. The percentage of questionnaire A, B, and C respondents for whom data was correctly complete for the short checklist was 50.4%, 84.0% and 95.0%, respectively, and was 0%, 5.0% and 5.9%, respectively, for the long version. As an example, 65.8%, 85.7% and 95.8% of the respondents of A, B, and C questionnaires, respectively, correctly identified the need for tuberculin skin test (p < 0.0001).
conclusionIn evaluating clinical practice with use of a clinical vignette, a multiple-choice format rather than an open-ended format overestimates physician performance. The insertion of deceptive response items mixed with correct items in closed-ended (multiple-choice) questionnaire failed to avoid this overestimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.