Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19636016›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2009

Phase I dose escalation, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of naptumomab estafenatox alone in patients with advanced cancer and with docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Hossein Borghaei, Katherine Alpaugh, Gunnar Hedlund, Göran Forsberg, Corey Langer, Andre Rogatko, Robert Hawkins, Svein Dueland, Ulrik Lassen, Roger B Cohen

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolution ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Two-stage design for phase I-II cancer clinical trials using continuous dose combinations of cytotoxic agents.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Immunotoxin Therapy for Lung Cancer.Chinese medical journal · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Adaptive dose-finding studies: a review of model-guided phase I clinical trials.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hossein BorghaeiDO, Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA. hossein.borghaei@fccc.edu
Katherine Alpaugh
Gunnar Hedlund
Göran Forsberg
Corey Langer
Andre Rogatko
Robert Hawkins
Svein Dueland
Ulrik Lassen
Roger B Cohen

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTwo phase I studies were conducted of ABR-217620 alone or in combination with docetaxel. This is a recombinant fusion protein consisting of a mutated variant of the superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin E (SEA/E-120) linked to fragment antigen binding moiety of a monoclonal antibody recognizing the tumor-associated antigen 5T4. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pancreatic cancer (PC), and renal cell cancer (RCC) received 5 daily boluses of ABR-217620 (3-month cycles) in escalating doses to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD; ABR-217620 dose escalation monotherapy [MONO] study). Doses were selected based on individual patient anti-SEA/E-120 titers pretreatment. Patients with NSCLC received 4 daily, escalating doses of ABR-217620 followed by docetaxel in 21-day cycles (ABR-217620 dose escalation combination with docetaxel [COMBO] study).

resultsThirty-nine patients were enrolled in the MONO study and 13 were enrolled in the COMBO study. The monotherapy MTD was 26 microg/kg (NSCLC and PC) and 15 microg/kg (RCC). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the MONO study were fever, hypotension, acute liver toxicity, and vascular leak syndrome. In the COMBO study, the MTD was 22 microg/kg (neutropenic sepsis). Adverse events included grade 1 to 2 fever, hypotension, nausea, and chills. Treatment caused a systemic increase of inflammatory cytokines and selective expansion of SEA/E-120 reactive T-cells. Tumor biopsies demonstrated T-cell infiltration after therapy. Fourteen patients (36%) had stable disease (SD) on day 56 of the MONO study. Two patients (15%) in the COMBO study had partial responses, one in a patient with progressive disease on prior docetaxel, and five patients (38%) had SD on day 56.

conclusionABR-217620 was well tolerated with evidence of immunological activity and antitumor activity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCytokinesDocetaxelEnterotoxinsEuropeFemaleHumansImmunoconjugatesKidney NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsLymphocyte ActivationLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingAntibodies, MonoclonalCytokinesDocetaxelEnterotoxinsImmunoconjugatesnaptumomab estafenatoxRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID19636016
PMCPMC2734423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.