Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19635944›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2009

A nonword repetition task for speakers with misarticulations: the Syllable Repetition Task (SRT).

Lawrence D Shriberg, Heather L Lohmeier, Thomas F Campbell, Christine A Dollaghan, Jordan R Green, Christopher A Moore

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Beyond Sounds: Decoding Speech Errors and Phonological Awareness in Preschoolers.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lawrence D ShribergWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. shriberg@waisman.wisc.edu
Heather L Lohmeier
Thomas F Campbell
Christine A Dollaghan
Jordan R Green
Christopher A Moore
The University of Texas at Dallas · USNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

WISCONSIN CENTER ON MENTAL RETARDATION: CORE SUPPORTP30HD003352 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MESSING, ALBEE · 1985 to 2015
$25.2M
STUDIES IN DEVELOPMENTAL PHONOLOGICAL DISORDERSR01DC000496 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SHRIBERG, LAWRENCE D · 1988 to 2017
$9.9M
WATER PRECAUTIONS AND TYMPANOSTOMY TUBESM01RR000084 · NCRR · CHILDREN'S HOSP PITTSBURGH/UPMC HLTH SYS · PI PERLMUTTER, DAVID H · 1985 to 2006
$5.6M
PHYSIOLOGIC DEVELOPMENT OF SPEECH PRODUCTIONR01DC000822 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SPENCER, KRISTIE A · 1998 to 2005
$2.8M
PHYSIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF SPEECH PRODUCTIONR29DC000822 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MOORE, CHRISTOPHER A · 1991 to 1995
–
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000084NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR00084NICHD NIH HHS HD03352NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD003352NIDCD NIH HHS DC00496NIDCD NIH HHS DC00822NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000496NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConceptual and methodological confounds occur when non(sense) word repetition tasks are administered to speakers who do not have the target speech sounds in their phonetic inventories or who habitually misarticulate targeted speech sounds. In this article, the authors (a) describe a nonword repetition task, the Syllable Repetiton Task (SRT), that eliminates this confound and (b) report findings from 3 validity studies.

methodNinety-five preschool children with speech delay and 63 with typical speech completed an assessment battery that included the Nonword Repetition Task (NRT; C. Dollaghan & T. F. Campbell, 1998) and the SRT. SRT stimuli include only 4 of the earliest occurring consonants and 1 early occurring vowel.

resultsStudy 1 findings indicated that the SRT eliminated the speech confound in nonword testing with speakers who misarticulate. Study 2 findings indicated that the accuracy of the SRT to identify expressive language impairment was comparable to findings for the NRT. Study 3 findings illustrated the SRT's potential to interrogate speech processing constraints underlying poor nonword repetition accuracy. Results supported both memorial and auditory-perceptual encoding constraints underlying nonword repetition errors in children with speech-language impairment.

conclusionThe SRT appears to be a psychometrically stable and substantively informative nonword repetition task for emerging genetic research and other research with speakers who misarticulate.

Indexed as

PhoneticsSpeech PerceptionArticulation DisordersChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualEducational StatusFemaleHumansLanguage TestsMaleMemoryMotivationPsychoacousticsReproducibility of ResultsVerbal Learning

Identifiers

PMID19635944
PMCPMC2930205
OpenAlexW1976040552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.