ReviewCognitive neuropsychiatry2009
Cognitive ontologies for neuropsychiatric phenomics research.
Review in Cognitive neuropsychiatry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Cortical Source of the P300 ERP Generator in the Associative Learning Task: A Consensus of Four Inversion Algorithms.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- An ecological model in support of an ontology of mental functioning.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Identification of phenomic data in the pathogenesis of cancers of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in the UK biobank.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- An academic survey on theoretical foundations, common assumptions and the current state of consciousness science.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2022Article
- The Mental Maxwell Relations: A Thermodynamic Allegory for Higher Brain Functions.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Impaired cognitive functioning in stress-induced exhaustion disorder: a new tablet-based assessment.BMC psychiatry · 2021Article
- Neuropsychological tests of the future: How do we get there from here?The Clinical neuropsychologist · 2019Review
- Applications of community detection techniques to brain graphs: Algorithmic considerations and implications for neural function.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2018Article
- Diversity in action: exchange of perspectives and reflections on taxonomies of individual differences.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018Review
- "Gestaltomics": Systems Biology Schemes for the Study of Neuropsychiatric Diseases.Frontiers in physiology · 2017Review
- Midbrain functional connectivity and ventral striatal dopamine D2-type receptors: link to impulsivity in methamphetamine users.Molecular psychiatry · 2016Article
- Intact error monitoring in combat Veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder.Psychiatry research · 2015Article
- A multilayer ontology of instruments for neurological, behavioral and cognitive assessments.Neuroinformatics · 2015Article
- Withholding and canceling a response in ADHD adolescents.Brain and behavior · 2014Article
- Understanding brain networks and brain organization.Physics of life reviews · 2014Review
- Category fluency, latent semantic analysis and schizophrenia: a candidate gene approach.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2014Article
- Modeling the autism spectrum disorder phenotype.Neuroinformatics · 2014Article
- A non-linear dynamical approach to belief revision in cognitive behavioral therapy.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2014Article
- Interdisciplinary perspectives on the development, integration, and application of cognitive ontologies.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2014Article
- The future of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience.NeuroImage · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Now that genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are dominating the landscape of genetic research on neuropsychiatric syndromes, investigators are being faced with complexity on an unprecedented scale. It is now clear that phenomics, the systematic study of phenotypes on a genome-wide scale, comprises a rate-limiting step on the road to genomic discovery. To gain traction on the myriad paths leading from genomic variation to syndromal manifestations, informatics strategies must be deployed to navigate increasingly broad domains of knowledge and help researchers find the most important signals. The success of the Gene Ontology project suggests the potential benefits of developing schemata to represent higher levels of phenotypic expression. Challenges in cognitive ontology development include the lack of formal definitions of key concepts and relations among entities, the inconsistent use of terminology across investigators and time, and the fact that relations among cognitive concepts are not likely to be well represented by simple hierarchical "tree" structures. Because cognitive concept labels are labile, there is a need to represent empirical findings at the cognitive test indicator level. This level of description has greater consistency, and benefits from operational definitions of its concepts and relations to quantitative data. Considering cognitive test indicators as the foundation of cognitive ontologies carries several implications, including the likely utility of cognitive task taxonomies. The concept of cognitive "test speciation" is introduced to mark the evolution of paradigms sufficiently unique that their results cannot be "mated" productively with others in meta-analysis. Several projects have been initiated to develop cognitive ontologies at the Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics (www.phenomics.ucla.edu), in the hope that these ultimately will enable more effective collaboration, and facilitate connections of information about cognitive phenotypes to other levels of biological knowledge. Several free web applications are available already to support examination and visualisation of cognitive concepts in the literature (PubGraph, PubAtlas, PubBrain) and to aid collaborative development of cognitive ontologies (Phenowiki and the Cognitive Atlas). It is hoped that these tools will help formalise inference about cognitive concepts in behavioural and neuroimaging studies, and facilitate discovery of the genetic bases of both healthy cognition and cognitive disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.