Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19634038›Full record

ReviewCognitive neuropsychiatry2009

Cognitive ontologies for neuropsychiatric phenomics research.

Robert M Bilder, Fred W Sabb, D Stott Parker, Donald Kalar, Wesley W Chu, Jared Fox, Nelson B Freimer, Russell A Poldrack

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive neuropsychiatry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Diversity in action: exchange of perspectives and reflections on taxonomies of individual differences.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Category fluency, latent semantic analysis and schizophrenia: a candidate gene approach.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert M BilderJane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. rbilder@mednet.ucla.edu
Fred W Sabb
D Stott Parker
Donald Kalar
Wesley W Chu
Jared Fox
Nelson B Freimer
Russell A Poldrack

Funding

Human Translational Applications Core (HTA - Core) (7 of 8)PL1MH083271 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BILDER, ROBERT M · 2007 to 2011
$5.8M
Whole Genome Assoc. Analysis Strategies for Multi. PhenotypesRL1MH083268 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FREIMER, NELSON B. · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics-Coordinating Center (1 of 8)UL1DE019580 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BILDER, ROBERT M · 2008 to 2011
$1.9M
The Cognitive Atlas: Developing an Interdisciplinary Knowledge Base Through SociaR01MH082795 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI POLDRACK, RUSSELL A · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
COGNITIVE PHENOTYPING:NEUROPSYCHIATRIC THERAPEUTICS(RMI)P20RR020750 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BILDER, ROBERT M · 2004 to 2006
$1.8M
Hypothesis Web Development for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics (6 of 8)RL1LM009833 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PARKER, DOUGLASS STOTT · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR020750NCRR NIH HHS P20RR020750NIDCR NIH HHS UL1 DE019580NIDCR NIH HHS UL1DE019580NIMH NIH HHS PL1 MH083271NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082795NIMH NIH HHS R01MH082795NIMH NIH HHS RL1 MH083268NIMH NIH HHS RL1MH083268NLM NIH HHS RL1 LM009833NLM NIH HHS RL1LM009833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Now that genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are dominating the landscape of genetic research on neuropsychiatric syndromes, investigators are being faced with complexity on an unprecedented scale. It is now clear that phenomics, the systematic study of phenotypes on a genome-wide scale, comprises a rate-limiting step on the road to genomic discovery. To gain traction on the myriad paths leading from genomic variation to syndromal manifestations, informatics strategies must be deployed to navigate increasingly broad domains of knowledge and help researchers find the most important signals. The success of the Gene Ontology project suggests the potential benefits of developing schemata to represent higher levels of phenotypic expression. Challenges in cognitive ontology development include the lack of formal definitions of key concepts and relations among entities, the inconsistent use of terminology across investigators and time, and the fact that relations among cognitive concepts are not likely to be well represented by simple hierarchical "tree" structures. Because cognitive concept labels are labile, there is a need to represent empirical findings at the cognitive test indicator level. This level of description has greater consistency, and benefits from operational definitions of its concepts and relations to quantitative data. Considering cognitive test indicators as the foundation of cognitive ontologies carries several implications, including the likely utility of cognitive task taxonomies. The concept of cognitive "test speciation" is introduced to mark the evolution of paradigms sufficiently unique that their results cannot be "mated" productively with others in meta-analysis. Several projects have been initiated to develop cognitive ontologies at the Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics (www.phenomics.ucla.edu), in the hope that these ultimately will enable more effective collaboration, and facilitate connections of information about cognitive phenotypes to other levels of biological knowledge. Several free web applications are available already to support examination and visualisation of cognitive concepts in the literature (PubGraph, PubAtlas, PubBrain) and to aid collaborative development of cognitive ontologies (Phenowiki and the Cognitive Atlas). It is hoped that these tools will help formalise inference about cognitive concepts in behavioural and neuroimaging studies, and facilitate discovery of the genetic bases of both healthy cognition and cognitive disorders.

Indexed as

CognitionCognition DisordersHumansMental DisordersNervous System DiseasesPhenotypeTerminology as Topic

Identifiers

PMID19634038
PMCPMC2752634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.