Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19631698›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2010

Formins and microtubules.

F Bartolini, G G Gundersen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Identification of an FMNL2 Interactome by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Septins mediate a microtubule-actin crosstalk that enables actin growth on microtubules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Regulation and outcomes of localized RNA translation.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2022
    Review
  20. Review

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

F BartoliniDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
G G Gundersen

Funding

REGULATION OF MICROTUBULES BY RHO GTPASESR01GM062939 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GUNDERSEN, GREGG G · 2001 to 2013
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formins have recently been recognized as prominent regulators of the microtubule (MT) cytoskeleton where they modulate the dynamics of selected MTs in interphase and mitosis. The association of formins with the MT cytoskeleton and their action on MT dynamics are relatively unexplored areas, yet growing evidence supports a direct role in their regulation of MT stability independent of their activity on actin. Formins regulate MT stability alone or in combination with accessory MT binding proteins that have previously been implicated in the stabilization of MTs downstream of polarity cues. As actin and MT arrays are typically remodeled downstream of signaling pathways that orchestrate cell shape and division, formins are emerging as excellent candidates for coordinating the responses of the cytoskeletal in diverse regulated and homeostatic processes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DivisionCytoskeletonFetal ProteinsForminsMicrofilament ProteinsMicrotubulesNeuronsNuclear ProteinsVirusesFetal ProteinsForminsMicrofilament ProteinsNuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19631698
PMCPMC2856479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.