ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2009
A combined expression-interaction model for inferring the temporal activity of transcription factors.
Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inferring TF activities and activity regulators from gene expression data with constraints from TF perturbation data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Integrating sequence, expression and interaction data to determine condition-specific miRNA regulation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
- A multi-layer inference approach to reconstruct condition-specific genes and their regulation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
- Learning transcriptional regulation on a genome scale: a theoretical analysis based on gene expression data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2012Review
- Bayesian inference based modelling for gene transcriptional dynamics by integrating multiple source of knowledge.BMC systems biology · 2012Article
- Direct measurement of DNA affinity landscapes on a high-throughput sequencing instrument.Nature biotechnology · 2011Article
- Computational methods for analyzing dynamic regulatory networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Methods suggested for reconstructing regulatory networks can be divided into two sets based on how the activity level of transcription factors (TFs) is inferred. The first group of methods relies on the expression levels of TFs, assuming that the activity of a TF is highly correlated with its mRNA abundance. The second treats the activity level as unobserved and infers it from the expression of the genes that the TF regulates. While both types of methods were successfully applied, each suffers from drawbacks that limit their accuracy. For the first set, the assumption that mRNA levels are correlated with activity is violated for many TFs due to post-transcriptional modifications. For the second, the expression level of a TF which might be informative is completely ignored. Here we present the post-transcriptional modification model (PTMM) that, unlike previous methods, utilizes both sources of data concurrently. Our method uses a switching model to determine whether a TF is transcriptionally or post-transcriptionally regulated. This model is combined with a factorial HMM to reconstruct the interactions in a dynamic regulatory network. Using simulated and real data, we show that PTMM outperforms the other two approaches discussed above. Using real data, we also show that PTMM can recover meaningful TF activity levels and identify post-transcriptionally modified TFs, many of which are supported by other sources. Supporting website: www.sb.cs.cmu.edu/PTMM/PTMM.html.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.