ArticleGene expression2009
Comparison of gene expression profiles of conjunctival cell lines with primary cultured conjunctival epithelial cells and human conjunctival tissue.
Article in Gene expression, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precise Control of Drug Release in Machine Learning-Designed Antibody-Eluting Implants for Postoperative Scarring Inhibition in Glaucoma.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Octenidine Dihydrochloride-Induced Cytotoxicity, Apoptosis, and Inflammatory Responses in Human Ocular Epithelial and Retinal Cells.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Inhibition of mTOR differently modulates planar and subepithelial fibrogenesis in human conjunctival fibroblasts.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- Is the Conjunctiva a Potential Target for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products?Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Development of In Vitro Corneal Models: Opportunity for Pharmacological Testing.Methods and protocols · 2020Review
- Potential of Ocular Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Review.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Proinflammatory Markers, Chemokines, and Enkephalin in Patients Suffering from Dry Eye Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Article
- Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 bacterial ghosts retain crucial surface properties and express chlamydial antigen: an imaging study of a delivery system for the ocular surface.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Article
- Tissue transglutaminase is a negative regulator of monomeric lacritin bioactivity.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2013Article
- Article
- Toll-like receptor activation modulates antimicrobial peptide expression by ocular surface cells.Experimental eye research · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human conjunctival cell lines are useful tools for modeling ocular surface disease and evaluation of ocular drugs and cosmetics. However, gene expression in these cells may not be comparable to primary cultured cells, raising doubts that they could be used as a substitute. We aimed to ascertain the similarities of global gene expression between commonly used cell lines and primary cells using a microarray approach. The Affymetrix U133A chip (>22,000 genes) was used to investigate conjunctival tissue (CT), primary conjunctival epithelial cells (PCEC), two conjunctival epithelial cell lines (IOBA-NHC and ChWK), and HCEC-T, a human corneal epithelial cell line (control). Using principal component analysis, the PCEC profile was clustered more closely to conjunctival tissue than either of the two cell lines. Certain extracellular matrix genes were differentially upregulated in CT compared to PCEC, suggesting presence of fibroblasts in addition to epithelial cells in CT. Overall, 67.3% (95% CI: 66.7-67.9) of transcripts in IOBA-NHC were within 1.5-fold of the corresponding transcripts in PCEC, but only 62.2% (95% CI: 61.5-62.9) in the case of ChWK. In HCEC-T, the proportion was only 58.8% (95% CI 58.1-59.4), suggesting less resemblance to PCEC than the conjunctival epithelial cell lines. The IOBA-NHC profile was more similar to PCEC than ChWK, for all genes and genes concerned with membrane association, communication, development, and regulation of metabolism, especially protein and nucleic acid metabolism. The correlation of normalized gene expression levels was high between either the IOBA-NHC or ChWK and PCEC for genes concerned with cell defense, viral life cycle, antigen presentation, antioxidation, or ubiquitin ligation. In order to evaluate the functional significance of the altered gene expression in IOBA-NHC cells, we evaluated a few proteins important for epithelial differentiation or defense, corresponding to the transcripts for S100A9, TGM2, and TLR4. Protein levels of S100A9 and TGM2 were indeed raised, and TLR4 decreased, in IOBA-NHC compared to PCEC. Gene expression in conjunctival cell lines differs from primary cells, but the profile varies according to functional gene categories. Depending on the methodology of proposed studies, if there is limited availability of PCEC, NHC-IOBA may be more suitable than ChWK, but even then, epithelial differentiation and innate immunity functions in NHC-IOBA may differ from primary cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.