Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19629539›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2009

Reduction of chemotherapy-induced anorexia, nausea, and emesis through a structured nursing intervention: a cluster-randomized multicenter trial.

Patrick Jahn, Petra Renz, Joerg Stukenkemper, Katrin Book, Oliver Kuss, Karin Jordan, Ingrid Horn, Anette Thoke-Colberg, Hans-Joachim Schmoll, Margarete Landenberger

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Self-management education interventions for patients with cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Can non-pharmacological strategies in cancer patients support perceived appetite? A scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Effect of Prechemotherapy Education Using Audio Visual Methods on the Distress of Patients with Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pharmaceutical care for patients with breast and ovarian cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick JahnInstitute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Strasse 8, 06097, Halle, Germany. patrick.jahn@medizin.uni-halle.de
Petra Renz
Joerg Stukenkemper
Katrin Book
Oliver Kuss
Karin Jordan
Ingrid Horn
Anette Thoke-Colberg
Hans-Joachim Schmoll
Margarete Landenberger
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this present study was to evaluate Self-care Improvement through Oncology Nursing (SCION) program to reduce distressing anorexia, nausea, and emesis (ANE) in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

methodsTwo hundred eight patients receiving chemotherapy with moderate to high emetogenic potential participated in a cluster randomized trial on 14 wards in two German university hospitals. Additionally to standard antiemetic treatment, patients from the intervention wards received the SCION program consisting of four modules: advisory consultation, optimizing emesis prophylaxis, nutrition counseling, and relaxation. Patients from the control group received standard antiemetic treatment and standard care. Primary outcome was the group difference in ANE intensity assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). MAIN

resultsThe SCION program did not result in a significant difference in the incidence of ANE symptoms as compared to standard care: mean difference on CTCAE scale was 0.24 pts (95%CI, -1.17 to 1.66 pts; P = 0.733). No difference could be found regarding patients' knowledge of side effects, self-care interventions, and agency. Health-related quality of life was significantly better for patients in the control group (mean difference 10.2 pts; 95%CI, 1.9 to 18.5; P = 0.017).

conclusionsContrary to our expectations, the groups did not differ in ANE intensity caused by the overall low acute or delayed symptom intensity. Symptom hierarchy in cancer patients alters and challenges nursing interventions targeting the patients' self-care strategies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnorexiaAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsCluster AnalysisFemaleGermanyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNauseaNeoplasmsOncology NursingAntiemeticsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID19629539
OpenAlexW2090682033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.