Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19629478›Full record

GuidelineEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2009

EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy : Part 2. Algorithms and clinical considerations for diagnosis of pulmonary emboli with V/P(SPECT) and MDCT.

M Bajc, J B Neilly, M Miniati, C Schuemichen, M Meignan, B Jonson

Open access · greenAbstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Bridging the gap: Communicating the results of ventilation: perfusion scans to clinicians.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Joint Guideline on Venous Thromboembolism - 2022.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Radioaerosols and the updated EANM guideline in ventilation/perfusion imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
  14. Guide for Nuclear Medicine Applications During the COVID-19 Outbreak.Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Economic Value of Hybrid Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography With Computed Tomography Imaging in Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Diagnosing venous thromboembolism in pregnancy.The British journal of radiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

M BajcDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Lund University Hospital, S-221 85, Lund, Sweden. Marika.bajc@med.lu.se
J B Neilly
M Miniati
C Schuemichen
M Meignan
B Jonson
Lund University · SEGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FRUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As emphasized in Part 1 of these guidelines, the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) is confirmed or refuted using ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy (V/P(SCAN)) or multidetector computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries (MDCT). To reduce the costs, the risks associated with false-negative and false-positive diagnoses, and unnecessary radiation exposure, preimaging assessment of clinical probability is recommended. Diagnostic accuracy is approximately equal for MDCT and planar V/P(SCAN) and better for tomography (V/P(SPECT)). V/P(SPECT) is feasible in about 99% of patients, while MDCT is often contraindicated. As MDCT is more readily available, access to both techniques is vital for the diagnosis of PE. V/P(SPECT) gives an effective radiation dose of 1.2-2 mSv. For V/P(SPECT), the effective dose is about 35-40% and the absorbed dose to the female breast 4% of the dose from MDCT performed with a dose-saving protocol. V/P(SPECT) is recommended as a first-line procedure in patients with suspected PE. It is particularly favoured in young patients, especially females, during pregnancy, and for follow-up and research.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyPulmonary EmbolismRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedVentilation-Perfusion RatioRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID19629478
OpenAlexW2116598729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.