Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19629383›Full record

ReviewInfection2009

A long journey from minimum inhibitory concentration testing to clinically predictive breakpoints: deterministic and probabilistic approaches in deriving breakpoints.

A Dalhoff, P G Ambrose, J W Mouton

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A DalhoffInstitute for Infection Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Brunswiker Strasse 4, Kiel, Germany, ADalhoff@t-online.de
P G Ambrose
J W Mouton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the origin of an "'International Collaborative Study on Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing'" in 1971, considerable advancement has been made to standardize clinical susceptibility testing procedures of antimicrobial agents. However, a consensus on the methods to be used and interpretive criteria was not reached, so the results of susceptibility testing were discrepant. Recently, the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing achieved a harmonization of existing methods for susceptibility testing and now co-ordinates the process for setting breakpoints. Previously, breakpoints were set by adjusting the mean pharmacokinetic parameters derived from healthy volunteers to the susceptibilities of a population of potential pathogens expressed as the mean minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or MIC90%. Breakpoints derived by the deterministic approach tend to be too high, since this procedure does not take the variabilities of drug exposure and the susceptibility patterns into account. Therefore, first-step mutants or borderline susceptible bacteria may be considered as fully susceptible. As the drug exposure of such sub-populations is inadequate, resistance development will increase and eradication rates will decrease, resulting in clinical failure. The science of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics integrates all possible drug exposures for standard dosage regimens and all MIC values likely to be found for the clinical isolates into the breakpoint definitions. Ideally, the data sets used originate from patients suffering from the disease to be treated. Probability density functions for both the pharmacokinetic and microbiological variables are determined, and a large number of MIC/drug exposure scenarios are calculated. Therefore, this method is defined as the probabilistic approach. The breakpoints thus derived are lower than the ones defined deterministically, as the entire range of probable drug exposures from low to high is modeled. Therefore, the amplification of drug-resistant sub-populations will be reduced. It has been a long journey since the first attempts in 1971 to define breakpoints. Clearly, this implies that none of the various approaches is right or wrong, and that the different approaches reflect different philosophies and mirror the tremendous progress made in the understanding of the pharmacodynamic properties of different classes of antimicrobials.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, StatisticalAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.