Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19629253›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2008

Guideline-compatible treatment of breast cancer patients: the status quo in schleswig-holstein.

Annika Waldmann, Ron Pritzkuleit, Heiner Raspe, Alexander Katalinic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Compliance of patients concerning recommended radiotherapy in breast cancer : Association with recurrence, age, and hormonal therapy].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2012
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annika Waldmann
Ron Pritzkuleit
Heiner Raspe
Alexander Katalinic

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt is unclear whether the care of breast cancer patients complies with the German breast cancer guideline and achieves the appropriate standard of care. For this reason the guideline's requirements were compared with the empirically determined health care provision in the German state of Schleswig-Holstein.

methodsThe OVIS-study is based on a postal questionnaire survey of medical care in 1927 breast cancer patients between 02/2003 to 02/2005. Statements such as "should be carried out" and "mandatory procedure" were cross-referenced with specific reference ranges.

resultsLocally invasive tumors were rare (pT 3/4: 8%). Preoperatively, 95% of patients received mammography, 78% breast ultrasound, 92% a chest x-ray, and 81% an abdominal ultrasound. 71% of all patients had breast conserving treatment, of whom 96% had irradiation of the remaining breast tissue. Axilla lymph node dissection was reported for 91%, axillary irradiation for 36%, and a systemic therapy for 95%. DISCUSSION: Local quality indicators comply in general with the German guideline. The high rate of axillary irradiation could be viewed as inadequate provision.

Indexed as

breast cancerdiagnosisguidelinequality assurancetreatment

Identifiers

PMID19629253
PMCPMC2707633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.