Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19629210›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2008

Regional differences in the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in primary care practices in Germany.

Susanne Moebus, Jens Hanisch, Peter Bramlage, Christian Lösch, Hans Hauner, Jürgen Wasem, Karl-Heinz Jöckel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Exercise Hypertension in Athletes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susanne Moebus
Jens Hanisch
Peter Bramlage
Christian Lösch
Hans Hauner
Jürgen Wasem
Karl-Heinz Jöckel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionData on the prevalence and regional distribution of the metabolic syndrome in Germany are lacking, in particular for primary care.

methodsIn October 2005 anthropometric measurements were taken from 35 869 consecutive patients aged 18 to 99 years, in 1511 primary care practices. Waist circumference, blood pressure, lifestyle, and past medical history were assessed and blood tests taken (HDL-, LDL- and total cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose). Crude and age-standardized prevalence were calculated.

resultsWomen in the eastern part of Germany showed a higher age-standardized prevalence of the metabolic syndrome than women in the western part (21.1%; 95% CI: 19.9 to 22.4 respectively 17.7%; 95% CI: 17.2 to 18.3). In men the prevalences were 22.7% (95% CI: 20.9 to 24.4) and 21.4% (95% CI: 20.6 to 22.1) respectively. Patients from Saxony-Anhalt, Brandenburg, and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania showed the highest prevalence, while women in Hamburg, Berlin, and Hesse and men in Schleswig-Holstein, Saarland, and Hamburg showed the lowest prevalence. Cardiovascular disease prevalence was comparable, while diabetes prevalence was higher in patients from eastern Germany (17% vs.13% in men; 12% vs. 9% in women). DISCUSSION: The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in German primary care is high. Prevention efforts should focus in particular on differences in gender, socioeconomic status, and region.

Indexed as

cardiovascular risk factorsdiabetes mellitusGermanymetabolic syndromeprevalenceprimary care

Identifiers

PMID19629210
PMCPMC2696781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.