Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19629197›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2008

Polar body diagnosis - a step in the right direction?

Katrin van der Ven, Markus Montag, Hans van der Ven

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Aneuploidy detection in pooled polar bodies using rapid nanopore sequencing.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024
    Article
  4. Chromosome Segregation in the Oocyte: What Goes Wrong during Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Katrin van der VenAbteilung für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie und Reproduktionsmedizin, Zentrum für Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Bonn.
Markus Montag
Hans van der Ven
Klinik für Frauenheilkunde · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPolar body diagnosis (PBD) is a new diagnostic method for the indirect genetic analysis of oocytes, which is carried out as part of in vitro fertilization. The biopsy of polar bodies is technically demanding and cannot be adopted uncritically in routine practice, in the absence of robust data to support this laboratory procedure.

methodsSelective literature review and analysis of own PBD data.

resultsThe main application of PBD is the detection of chromosomal aneuploidies and maternally inherited translocations in oocytes. The major disadvantage of PBD is that the paternal contribution to the genetic constitution of the developing embryo cannot be evaluated. Moreover, the potential value of polar body biopsy for the diagnosis of monogenetic diseases is limited. DISCUSSION: The role of PBD in improving of success rates in assisted reproduction requires evaluation in further clinical trials. For maternal translocations, PBD can be used to reduce the risk of miscarriage. Rapid development in the field of molecular diagnostic and biopsy techniques will also influence PBD and will most likely allow wider application of this method in the near future.

Indexed as

aneuploidy testinginfertilityin vitro fertilizationoocytepolar body diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID19629197
PMCPMC2696746
OpenAlexW2206938914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.