ArticlePLoS computational biology2009
Cooperativity dominates the genomic organization of p53-response elements: a mechanistic view.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Roles of computational modelling in understanding p53 structure, biology, and its therapeutic targeting.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2019Review
- Predicting conformational ensembles and genome-wide transcription factor binding sites from DNA sequences.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- p53 dynamics upon response element recognition explored by molecular simulations.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Genome-wide analysis of the p53 gene regulatory network in the developing mouse kidney.Physiological genomics · 2013Article
- Widespread evidence of cooperative DNA binding by transcription factors in Drosophila development.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Structure of p53 binding to the BAX response element reveals DNA unwinding and compression to accommodate base-pair insertion.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Molecular dynamics simulations of double-stranded DNA in an explicit solvent model with the zero-dipole summation method.PloS one · 2013Article
- Transcription factor oscillations induce differential gene expressions.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
- Lysine120 interactions with p53 response elements can allosterically direct p53 organization.PLoS computational biology · 2010Article
- The tumor suppressor p53: from structures to drug discovery.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2010Review
- Mechanisms of transcription factor selectivity.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2010Review
- Preferred drifting along the DNA major groove and cooperative anchoring of the p53 core domain: mechanisms and scenarios.Journal of molecular recognition : JMRArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
p53-response elements (p53-REs) are organized as two repeats of a palindromic DNA segment spaced by 0 to 20 base pairs (bp). Several experiments indicate that in the vast majority of the human p53-REs there are no spacers between the two repeats; those with spacers, particularly with sizes beyond two nucleotides, are rare. This raises the question of what it indicates about the factors determining the p53-RE genomic organization. Clearly, given the double helical DNA conformation, the orientation of two p53 core domain dimers with respect to each other will vary depending on the spacer size: a small spacer of 0 to 2 bps will lead to the closest p53 dimer-dimer orientation; a 10-bp spacer will locate the p53 dimers on the same DNA face but necessitate DNA looping; while a 5-bp spacer will position the p53 dimers on opposite DNA faces. Here, via conformational analysis we show that when there are 0-2 bp spacers, p53-DNA binding is cooperative; however, cooperativity is greatly diminished when there are spacers with sizes beyond 2 bp. Cooperative binding is broadly recognized to be crucial for biological processes, including transcriptional regulation. Our results clearly indicate that cooperativity of the p53-DNA association dominates the genomic organization of the p53-REs, raising questions of the structural organization and functional roles of p53-REs with larger spacers. We further propose that a dynamic landscape scenario of p53 and p53-REs can better explain the selectivity of the degenerate p53-REs. Our conclusions bear on the evolutionary preference of the p53-RE organization and as such, are expected to have broad implications to other multimeric transcription factor response element organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.