Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19628376›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2009

Event-related potential abnormalities in schizophrenia: a failure to "gate in" salient information?

Colleen A Brenner, Paul D Kieffaber, Brett A Clementz, Jason K Johannesen, Anantha Shekhar, Brian F O'Donnell, William P Hetrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Auditory gating and its clinical correlates in adults with chronic tic disorder and neurotypical adults.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Colleen A BrennerUniversity of British Columbia, Department of Psychology, Vancouver, BC, Canada. cbrenner@psych.ubc.ca
Paul D Kieffaber
Brett A Clementz
Jason K Johannesen
Anantha Shekhar
Brian F O'Donnell
William P Hetrick
Larue Carter Hospital · USIndiana University School of MedicineUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Georgia · USVA Connecticut Healthcare System · USWilliam & Mary · US

Funding

Cerebellar timing dysfunction in schizophreniaR01MH074983 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HETRICK, WILLIAM P · 2006 to 2016
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS MH074983-0NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory gating refers to the central nervous system's ability to filter sensory inputs, and can be measured by comparing the suppression of event-related brain potential (ERP) amplitudes in a paired auditory stimulus procedure. Poor gating scores in schizophrenia may be caused by abnormal responses to the first (S1), the second (S2) or both of the paired stimuli. However, since S1 and S2 responses may index separate psychological phenomenon, corresponding to the ability to "gate in" and "gate out" sensory stimuli respectively, the precise mechanism affected in schizophrenia remains unclear. To examine the extent to which saliency processing abnormalities may contribute to S1 response deficits, standard and rare (15% probability) paired stimuli were presented to 21 participants with schizophrenia and 22 healthy controls. P50 and N100 ERP amplitude as well as low, beta and gamma frequency power were measured to examine the time course and relative contributions of oscillatory activity affecting auditory processing in schizophrenia. In this study, schizophrenia patients exhibited less evoked beta 1 power (12-20 Hz) in response to salient stimuli at S1, and lower N100 amplitude in response to all S1 stimuli. No group differences were found in the low, beta 2 (20-30 Hz), or gamma frequency ranges. These findings suggest aberrant sensory processing during stages of stimulus evaluation and saliency detection in schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAnalysis of VarianceElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleFourier AnalysisGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychotic DisordersReaction TimeSchizophreniaTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID19628376
PMCPMC2820396
OpenAlexW2147190696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.