Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19628035›Full record

ReviewFree radical biology & medicine2009

Nox proteins in signal transduction.

David I Brown, Kathy K Griendling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Free radical biology & medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 400 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
400citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

400 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. HACS omega · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

340 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David I BrownDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University, 1639 Pierce Drive, 319 WMB Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Kathy K Griendling

Funding

Vascular Oxidases in MigrationR01HL058863 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GRIENDLING, KATHY K · 1997 to 2014
$4.1M
NOX4 and vascular smooth muscle differentiationR37HL038206 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GRIENDLING, KATHY K · 2006 to 2015
$3.8M
VASCULAR SMOOTH MUSCLE PHOSPHOLIPASE DR01HL038206 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GRIENDLING, KATHY K · 1993 to 2005
$2.1M
DIACYLGLYCEROL SIGNALING IN VASCULAR SMOOTH MUSCLER29HL038206 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GRIENDLING, KATHY K · 1987 to 1991
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL058863NHLBI NIH HHS HL38206NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL038206NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL058863NHLBI NIH HHS R37 HL038206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NADPH oxidase (Nox) family of superoxide (O(2)(*-)) and hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2))-producing proteins has emerged as an important source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in signal transduction. ROS produced by Nox proteins Nox1-5 and Duox1/2 are now recognized to play essential roles in the physiology of the brain, the immune system, the vasculature, and the digestive tract as well as in hormone synthesis. Nox-derived ROS have been implicated in regulation of cytoskeletal remodeling, gene expression, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and cell death. These processes are tightly controlled and reversible. In this review, we will discuss recent literature on Nox protein tissue distribution, subcellular localization, activation, and the resulting signal transduction mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansNADPH OxidasesReactive Oxygen SpeciesSignal TransductionNADPH OxidasesReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID19628035
PMCPMC2763943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.