Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19628015›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2009

"Splicing up" drug discovery. Cell-based expression and screening of genetically-encoded libraries of backbone-cyclized polypeptides.

Harshkumar Sancheti, Julio A Camarero

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recombinant Expression of Cyclotides Using Split Inteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Peptide aptamers: development and applications.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2015
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Biological synthesis of circular polypeptides.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2012
    Review
  15. Peptide bicycles that inhibit the Grb2 SH2 domain.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2012
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cellular uptake of cyclotide MCoTI-I follows multiple endocytic pathways.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2011
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harshkumar SanchetiDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Julio A Camarero
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Cell-based screening and selection of cyclotide-based capture reagents for proteiR01GM090323 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CAMARERO, JULIO A · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM090323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present paper reviews the use of protein splicing for the biosynthesis of backbone cyclic polypeptides. This general method allows the in vivo and in vitro biosynthesis of cyclic polypeptides using recombinant DNA expression techniques. Biosynthetic access to backbone cyclic peptides opens the possibility to generate cell-based combinatorial libraries that can be screened inside living cells for their ability to attenuate or inhibit cellular processes thus providing a new way for finding therapeutic agents.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryPeptide LibraryProtein SplicingPeptidesPeptides, CyclicRecombinant ProteinsPeptide LibraryPeptidesPeptides, CyclicRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19628015
PMCPMC3329944
OpenAlexW1996709524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.