Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19627870›Full record

ArticlePM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2009

Disparities in stroke rehabilitation: results of a study in an integrated health system in northern California.

M Elizabeth Sandel, Hua Wang, Joseph Terdiman, Jeanne M Hoffman, Marcia A Ciol, Steven Sidney, Charles Quesenberry, Qi Lu, Leighton Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Disparity in rehabilitation: another inconvenient truth.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M Elizabeth SandelPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Napa Solano Service Area, and Research and Training, Kaiser Foundation Rehabilitation Center, Vallejo, CA 94589, USA. elizabeth.sandel@kp.org
Hua Wang
Joseph Terdiman
Jeanne M Hoffman
Marcia A Ciol
Steven Sidney
Charles Quesenberry
Qi Lu
Leighton Chan
Kaiser Permanente · USKaiser Foundation Hospital · USUniversity of Washington · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

An outcome monitoring system for post acute careZIACL060064 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI CHAN, LEIGHTON · 2009 to 2014
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CL060064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether there are disparities in postacute stroke rehabilitation based on type of stroke, race/ethnicity, sex/gender, age, socioeconomic status, geographic region, or service area referral patterns in a large integrated health system with multiple levels of care.

designCohort study tracking rehabilitation services for 365 days after acute hospitalization for a first stroke.

settingThe Northern California Kaiser Permanente Health System (approximately 3.3 million membership population)

participantsA total of 11,119 patients hospitalized for acute stroke from 1996 to 2003. The cohort includes patients discharged from acute care after a stroke. Postacute care rehabilitation services were evaluated according to the level of care ever-received within the 365 days after discharge from acute care, including inpatient rehabilitation hospital (IRH), skilled nursing facility (SNF), home health and outpatient, or no rehabilitation services.

interventionsNot applicable.

main outcome measureService delivery.

resultsPatients discharged to an IRH had longer lengths of stay in acute care. Patients with hemorrhagic stroke were less likely to be treated in an IRH. Patients whose highest level of rehabilitation was SNF were older and more likely to be women. After adjusting for age and other covariates, women were less likely to go to an IRH than men. Asian and black patients were more likely than white patients to be treated in an IRH or SNF. Also more likely to go to an IRH were patients from higher socioeconomic groups, from urban areas, and from geographic areas close to the regional rehabilitation hospital.

conclusionsThese results suggest variation in care delivery and extent of postacute care based on differences in patient demographics and geographic factors. Results also varied over time. Some minority populations in this cohort appeared to be more likely to receive IRH care, possibly because of disease severity, family support systems, cultural factors, or differences in referral patterns.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesStroke RehabilitationAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCaliforniaFemaleHealth Maintenance OrganizationsHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRehabilitation CentersSex FactorsSmall-Area Analysis

Identifiers

PMID19627870
PMCPMC3432287
OpenAlexW2058492705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.