Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19627661›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2009

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis as a treatment option for hyperlipidemia.

Puja K Mehta, Jefferson Baer, Christine Nell, Laurence S Sperling

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01138371 (Inflammatory and Lipid Markers Pre- and Post-LDL Apheresis), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01138371 completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Inflammatory and Lipid Markers Pre- and Post-LDL Apheresis: A Multicenter Experience

TypeobservationalSponsorEmory UniversityRan2011 to 2012Enrolled8ConditionsFamilial HypercholesterolemiaArmsLDL Apheresis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Familial hypercholesterolemia: A review.Annals of pediatric cardiology · 2014
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Puja K MehtaDivision of Cardiology, Center for Heart Disease Prevention, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jefferson Baer
Christine Nell
Laurence S Sperling
Emory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data support the relevance of blood cholesterol levels, particularly high levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), in the pathogenesis and progression of atherosclerosis. A strong and continuous relationship between dyslipidemia and vascular morbidity and mortality has been established. The initial approach to treating dyslipidemia consists of lifestyle modifications followed by pharmacologic therapy, usually beginning with a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. Some patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) fail to achieve their LDL goal despite aggressive pharmacologic therapy. In certain cases, LDL apheresis may be an effective therapeutic option. In the United States, LDL apheresis is approved for homozygous FH patients with an LDL cholesterol level >/= 500 mg/dL. For patients with heterozygous FH, LDL apheresis may be offered if their LDL is >/= 300 mg/dL, or >/= 200 mg/dL with known coronary artery disease, despite maximum medical treatment. This review focuses on the principles and methods of LDL apheresis, its potential benefit in clinical care, and its current indications.

Identifiers

PMID19627661
OpenAlexW1970086181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.