Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19627178›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2009

Next-generation sequencing: a transformative tool for vaccinology.

Neelam Dhiman, David I Smith, Gregory A Poland

Abstract readEditorialReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. High-throughput Sequencing in Vaccine Research.Journal of veterinary research · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Vaccines, reverse vaccinology, and bacterial pathogenesis.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2013
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Systems vaccinology: learning to compute the behavior of vaccine induced immunity.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neelam Dhiman
David I Smith
Gregory A Poland

Funding

MAYO CLINIC CENTER FOR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE ACTIVITIESUL1RR024150 · NCRR · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RIZZA, ROBERT A. · 2006 to 2011
$66.4M
The Immunogenetics of Measles ImmunityR01AI033144 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI POLAND, GREGORY A. · 1993 to 2022
$8.1M
Immunogenetic Mechanisms of Vaccine ResponseR37AI048793 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI POLAND, GREGORY A. · 2011 to 2020
$5.4M
IMMUNOGENETIC MECHANISMS OF VACCINE RESPONSER01AI048793 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI POLAND, GREGORY A. · 2001 to 2010
$4.3M
NCRR NIH HHS 1 UL1 RR024150-01NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024150NIAID NIH HHS AI 33144NIAID NIH HHS AI 48793NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI040065NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI 40065NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI033144NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI048793NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI048793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

HumansSequence Analysis, DNAVaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID19627178
PMCPMC2843135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.