Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19626385›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology

Clinical effectiveness of coronary computed tomographic angiography in the triage of patients to cardiac catheterization and revascularization after inconclusive stress testing: results of a 2-year prospective trial.

Aiden Abidov, Michael J Gallagher, Kavitha M Chinnaiyan, Laxmi S Mehta, James H Wegner, Gilbert L Raff

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Personalized 3D printed coronary models in coronary stenting.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Left main disease diagnosis: The Achilles heel or the great strength of modern cardiac imaging?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. What is the Value of CT Angiography for Patients with Acute Chest Pain?Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2010
    Article
  16. Multimodality cardiac imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
    Article
  17. What to do with an equivocal myocardial perfusion study?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aiden AbidovSarver Heart Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. abidova@cshs.org
Michael J Gallagher
Kavitha M Chinnaiyan
Laxmi S Mehta
James H Wegner
Gilbert L Raff
Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) and inconclusive stress imaging test findings may result in invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) may be useful in defining the risk of CAD and adverse outcomes in this patient population, as well as in reducing the need for ICA.

methodsWe prospectively enrolled 199 sequential patients referred by cardiologists for CCTA after either inconclusive or nondiagnostic stress imaging tests. Before CCTA, physicians identified a "planned catheterization" group of patients who would undergo invasive angiography if CCTA were not available. After CCTA testing, patients were followed for >or=2 years. We established the added diagnostic value of the CCTA and its prognostic power in prediction of intermediate-term follow-up events in this patient population as compared to available historical and clinical predictors of CAD, stress ECG, and stress imaging test results using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards survival analysis.

resultsBoth observed data and results of the multivariable model for the prediction of obstructive CAD (>50% stenosis), or major cardiac events (death MI or revascularization), demonstrated that clinical, stress ECG, and imaging results were weakly predictive, whereas CCTA was found to be a strong independent and incremental predictor of the absence of either significant CAD or MACE in this population. None of the 93 patients with normal CCTA scans had MACE events, whereas 18 patients with evidence of CAD on the CCTA results underwent revascularization. Overall, physicians planned ICA in 125 patients (63.0%); after CCTA, ICA was performed in only 32 (16.0%) cases over 2 years. In this population with no other highly effective noninvasive clinical tools for diagnostic and prognostic estimation, the overall negative predictive value of CCTA for either CAD > 50% or MACE for 2 years was 99%.

conclusionObservations from this prospective study demonstrate the significant added diagnostic value and prognostic potential of CCTA in patients with suspected CAD and either inconclusive or nondiagnostic stress test results in real-world settings. Normal CCTA results are associated with excellent intermediate-term prognosis in this clinical subset, and invasive angiography can be safely avoided in the majority of these patients when the results of CCTA are available.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseExercise TestFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial RevascularizationOutcome Assessment, Health CarePreoperative CarePrognosisProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID19626385
OpenAlexW1971245275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.