Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19626384›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology

Optimization and validation of radionuclide angiography phase analysis parameters for quantification of mechanical dyssynchrony.

Richard Wassenaar, David O'Connor, Barbora Dej, Terrence David Ruddy, David Birnie

Abstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SimultaneousClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2025
    Article
  2. Beta-blockers and mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure assessed by radionuclide ventriculography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Towards pre-treatment imaging prediction of chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Single-photon cardiac imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Review
  5. Prognostic value of left-ventricular systolic and diastolic dyssynchrony measured from gated SPECT MPI in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Phase analysis of gated PET in the evaluation of mechanical ventricular synchrony: A narrative overview.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Review
  7. The role of nuclear medicine in assessments of cardiac dyssynchrony.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cardiac dyssynchrony: we have the tools. It is time to use them.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. SPECT blood pool phase analysis can accurately and reproducibly quantify mechanical dyssynchrony.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2010
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Cardiac resynchronization therapy; the importance of evaluating cardiac metabolism.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2010
    Article
  16. Cardiac resynchronization therapy; evaluation by advanced imaging techniques.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2010
    Article
  17. Imaging synchrony.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard WassenaarDivision of Nuclear Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada. rwassenaar@ottawahospital.on.ca
David O'Connor
Barbora Dej
Terrence David Ruddy
David Birnie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has the potential to improve the outcome of patients suffering from mechanical dyssynchrony and heart failure. It has been suggested that accurate quantification of baseline extent of mechanical dyssynchrony may lead to pre-selection of patients likely to respond to CRT. The standard deviation from a phase histogram (phaseSD), synchrony (S) and entropy (E) are parameters obtained from phase analysis of planar radionuclide angiography (RNA) that may provide an accurate means of assessing mechanical dyssynchrony. In this paper, the ability of phaseSD, S, and E to detect mechanical dyssynchrony was investigated and optimal values for image smoothing, histogram noise thresholding, and bin size were defined. Finally, the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the methodology was assessed.

methodsPhaseSD, S, and E were calculated for 37 normal subjects (LVEF > 50%, end-diastolic volume < 120 mL, end-systolic volume < 60 mL, QRS < 120 ms, and normal wall motion) and 53 patients with mechanical dyssynchrony (LVEF < 30%, QRS > 120 ms, and typical LBBB). Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curves were created and the area under the curve (AUC), for each parameter, was determined using three different imaging filters (no filter and an order 5 Hann filter with cut-off of 5/50 and 10/50). The AUC was also determined using histogram threshold values varying between 0% and 50% (of the max amplitude value). Finally, AUC for E was determined for bins sizes varying between 1 degrees and 20 degrees . Inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated at optimal imaging values.

resultsNo smoothing was found to maximize the AUC. The AUC was independent of histogram threshold value. However, a value of 20% provided optimal visualization of the phase image. The AUC was also independent of bin size. At the optimal imaging values, the sensitivity and specificity for all parameters for detection of mechanical dyssynchrony was measured to be 89-100%. Inter- and intra-observer correlation coefficients >0.99 were found for phaseSD, S and E.

conclusionsOptimized planar RNA phase analysis parameters, phaseSD, S, and E, were able to detect mechanical dyssynchrony with low inter- and intra-observer variability. Studies assessing the ability of these parameters to predict CRT outcome are required.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgedFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonVentricular Dysfunction, Left

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.