ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2009
Medical and ethical considerations in twin pregnancies discordant for serious cardiac disease.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ethical dilemmas in continuing pregnancy after a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.BMC medical ethics · 2025Pooled it
- Ethical issues in fetal management: a cardiac perspective.International journal of pediatrics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePrenatal ultrasound has led to the early diagnosis of major anomalies. However, the ready availability of this technology has led to increasing challenges for physicians counseling affected parents, which is all the more difficult in a twin pregnancy with only one affected fetus. This paper reviews the medical and ethical considerations in twin pregnancies discordant for a serious cardiac condition. STUDY
designSix recent twin pregnancies discordant for a serious cardiac condition and their outcomes are presented. Options considered in the management of the pregnancy were to continue or terminate the pregnancy, selectively terminate the affected twin or to decide whether to treat the affected twin once delivered. An approach to decision making in such situations has been formulated after critical analysis of the factors involved.
resultsFour of the six pregnancies were monochorionic twins. Two sets of parents decided to terminate the pregnancy. In the four that continued, two opted for the affected twin to be appropriately managed once delivered. A further two considered selective termination but opted to continue the pregnancy because of the risk of premature labor and/or cerebral hypoxia following such intervention. They sought a commitment, however, that they be given the option whether to treat the affected twin following delivery. Eventually both elected to have their babies treated, one of whom died in the postoperative period. DISCUSSION: Medical considerations included the risks of continuation of the pregnancy for the mother and her twins, the safety of termination (total or selective), and the risks to the unaffected fetus. Ethical issues revolved around concepts of autonomy, beneficence and justice from the standpoint of the family and the twins. The gestation and the viability of the twins played an important role in decision making and approaches, taking into account the local legal and other considerations.
conclusionAttention is drawn to the complexities of the issues involved in twin pregnancies complicated by a serious cardiac condition in one of the twins. Optimal counseling requires sound clinical knowledge about the medical risks to the mother and her twins, and a clear understanding of the key ethical considerations. Such an approach will assist parents in their very difficult decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19626028What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.