Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19625681›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of clinical nutrition2009

Variation in umami perception and in candidate genes for the umami receptor in mice and humans.

Noriatsu Shigemura, Shinya Shirosaki, Tadahiro Ohkuri, Keisuke Sanematsu, A A Shahidul Islam, Yoko Ogiwara, Misako Kawai, Ryusuke Yoshida, Yuzo Ninomiya

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Taste Receptor Signaling.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Minireview: Nutrient sensing by G protein-coupled receptors.Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2013
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Cooking clue to human dietary diversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  16. Genetics of taste and smell: poisons and pleasures.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2010
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Taste receptors for umami: the case for multiple receptors.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2009
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Luminal chemosensing and upper gastrointestinal mucosal defenses.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noriatsu ShigemuraKyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. shigemura@dent.kyushu-u
Shinya Shirosaki
Tadahiro Ohkuri
Keisuke Sanematsu
A A Shahidul Islam
Yoko Ogiwara
Misako Kawai
Ryusuke Yoshida
Yuzo Ninomiya
Ajinomoto (Japan) · JPKyushu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unique taste induced by monosodium glutamate is referred to as umami taste. The umami taste is also elicited by the purine nucleotides inosine 5'-monophosphate and guanosine 5'-monophosphate. There is evidence that a heterodimeric G protein-coupled receptor, which consists of the T1R1 (taste receptor type 1, member 1, Tas1r1) and the T1R3 (taste receptor type 1, member 3, Tas1r3) proteins, functions as an umami taste receptor for rodents and humans. Splice variants of metabotropic glutamate receptors, mGluR(1) (glutamate receptor, metabotropic 1, Grm1) and mGluR(4) (glutamate receptor, metabotropic 4, Grm4), also have been proposed as taste receptors for glutamate. The taste sensitivity to umami substances varies in inbred mouse strains and in individual humans. However, little is known about the relation of umami taste sensitivity to variations in candidate umami receptor genes in rodents or in humans. In this article, we summarize current knowledge of the diversity of umami perception in mice and humans. Furthermore, we combine previously published data and new information from the single nucleotide polymorphism databases regarding variation in the mouse and human candidate umami receptor genes: mouse Tas1r1 (TAS1R1 for human), mouse Tas1r3 (TAS1R3 for human), mouse Grm1 (GRM1 for human), and mouse Grm4 (GRM4 for human). Finally, we discuss prospective associations between variation of these genes and umami taste perception in both species.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsHumansMicePolymorphism, Single NucleotideReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, Metabotropic GlutamateSodium GlutamateTasteTaste PerceptionReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, Metabotropic GlutamateSodium Glutamate

Identifiers

PMID19625681
PMCPMC3136005
OpenAlexW2171052802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.