Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19625222›Full record

ArticleDNA repair2009

Cellular pathways for DNA repair and damage tolerance of formaldehyde-induced DNA-protein crosslinks.

Bendert de Graaf, Adam Clore, Amanda K McCullough

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA repair, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Yeast Rpn4 Links the Proteasome and DNA Repair viaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bendert de GraafDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Center for Research on Occupational and Environmental Toxicology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, 97239, USA.
Adam Clore
Amanda K McCullough
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Synthetic Approaches to Carcinogen-Linked OligonucleotidesP01CA160032 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI STONE, MICHAEL P · 2012 to 2022
$14.0M
SYNTHETIC APPROACHES TO PAH-ADDUCTED NUCLEOTIDESP01ES005355 · NIEHS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LLOYD, STEPHEN CARROLL · 1991 to 2010
$13.4M
Cellular Responses to DNA-Protein CrosslinksR01CA106858 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LLOYD, R. STEPHEN, MCCULLOUGH, AMANDA K · 2004 to 2016
$3.2M
Discovery and development of OGG1 activators as precision drugs for modification of Alzheimer's disease progression.R43AG084412 · NIA · LUCIOLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · PI RUMSEY, WILLIAM L · 2023 to 2024
$502k
BASE FLIPPING AND DNA DAMAGE RECOGNITIONF32ES005780 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI MCCULLOUGH, AMANDA K · 1997 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA160032NCI NIH HHS R01 CA106858NIA NIH HHS R43 AG084412NIEHS NIH HHS F32 ES005780NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES005355NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES05355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is well established that DNA-protein crosslinks are formed as a consequence of cellular exposure to agents such as formaldehyde, transplatin, ionizing and ultraviolet radiation, the biochemical pathways that promote cellular survival via repair or tolerance of these lesions are poorly understood. To investigate the mechanisms that function to limit DNA-protein crosslink-induced cytotoxicity, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae non-essential gene deletion library was screened for increased sensitivity to formaldehyde exposure. Following low dose, chronic exposure, strains containing deletions in genes mediating homologous recombination showed the greatest sensitivity, while under the same exposure conditions, deletions in genes associated with nucleotide excision repair conferred only low to moderate sensitivities. However, when the exposure regime was changed to a high dose acute (short-term) formaldehyde treatment, the genes that conferred maximal survival switched to the nucleotide excision repair pathway, with little contribution of the homologous recombination genes. Data are presented which suggest that following acute formaldehyde exposure, repair and/or tolerance of DNA-protein crosslinks proceeds via formation of nucleotide excision repair-dependent single-strand break intermediates and without a detectable accumulation of double-strand breaks. These data clearly demonstrate a differential pathway response to chronic versus acute formaldehyde exposures and may have significance and implications for risk extrapolation in human exposure studies.

Indexed as

DNA DamageCross-Linking ReagentsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA Breaks, Single-StrandedDNA, FungalDNA RepairFormaldehydeFungal ProteinsGene DeletionGene LibraryProtein BindingRecombination, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTime FactorsCross-Linking ReagentsDNA, FungalFormaldehydeFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19625222
PMCPMC2748227
OpenAlexW2038268456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.