ArticleBMC medical genomics2009
Prediction of acute multiple sclerosis relapses by transcription levels of peripheral blood cells.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- A CD8Nature communications · 2021Trial
- A novel gene signature for forecasting time to next relapse in multiple sclerosis using peripheral blood mononuclear cells.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of disease progression in primary progressive multiple sclerosis.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Role of ferroptosis in neuroimmunity and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis revealed by multi-omics data.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Prognostic models for predicting clinical disease progression, worsening and activity in people with multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Impaired Expression of Tetraspanin 32 (TSPAN32) in Memory T Cells of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Development and Validation of a Five-Gene Signature to Predict Relapse-Free Survival in Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- In Silico and In Vivo Analysis of IL37 in Multiple Sclerosis Reveals Its Probable Homeostatic Role on the Clinical Activity, Disability, and Treatment with Fingolimod.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Gene expression differences between PAXgene and Tempus blood RNA tubes are highly reproducible between independent samples and biobanks.BMC research notes · 2017Article
- Arete - candidate gene prioritization using biological network topology with additional evidence types.BioData mining · 2017Article
- Biomarkers of therapeutic response in multiple sclerosis: current status.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2014Review
- Fluorescently activated cell sorting followed by microarray profiling of helper T cell subtypes from human peripheral blood.PloS one · 2014Article
- Article
- Common and specific signatures of gene expression and protein-protein interactions in autoimmune diseases.Genes and immunity · 2013Article
- Deep brain stimulation induces rapidly reversible transcript changes in Parkinson's leucocytes.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2012Article
- Reassessment of blood gene expression markers for the prognosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.PloS one · 2011Article
- Transient peripheral immune response and central nervous system leaky compartmentalization in a viral model for multiple sclerosis.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2010Article
- Assessing the human immune system through blood transcriptomics.BMC biology · 2010Review
- Gene expression changes in multiple sclerosis relapse suggest activation of T and non-T cells.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ability to predict the spatial frequency of relapses in multiple sclerosis (MS) would enable physicians to decide when to intervene more aggressively and to plan clinical trials more accurately.
methodsIn the current study our objective was to determine if subsets of genes can predict the time to the next acute relapse in patients with MS. Data-mining and predictive modeling tools were utilized to analyze a gene-expression dataset of 94 non-treated patients; 62 patients with definite MS and 32 patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). The dataset included the expression levels of 10,594 genes and annotated sequences corresponding to 22,215 gene-transcripts that appear in the microarray.
resultsWe designed a two stage predictor. The first stage predictor was based on the expression level of 10 genes, and predicted the time to next relapse with a resolution of 500 days (error rate 0.079, p < 0.001). If the predicted relapse was to occur in less than 500 days, a second stage predictor based on an additional different set of 9 genes was used to give a more accurate estimation of the time till the next relapse (in resolution of 50 days). The error rate of the second stage predictor was 2.3 fold lower than the error rate of random predictions (error rate = 0.35, p < 0.001). The predictors were further evaluated and found effective both for untreated MS patients and for MS patients that subsequently received immunomodulatory treatments after the initial testing (the error rate of the first level predictor was < 0.18 with p < 0.001 for all the patient groups).
conclusionWe conclude that gene expression analysis is a valuable tool that can be used in clinical practice to predict future MS disease activity. Similar approach can be also useful for dealing with other autoimmune diseases that characterized by relapsing-remitting nature.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.