Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19623080›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2009

Personal utility and genomic information: look before you leap.

Scott D Grosse, Colleen M McBride, James P Evans, Muin J Khoury

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Qualitative study of system-level factors related to genomic implementation.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
  10. "Well, good luck with that": reactions to learning of increased genetic risk for Alzheimer disease.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2015
    Article
  18. Valuations of genetic test information for treatable conditions: the case of colorectal cancer screening.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2014
    Article
  19. Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2014
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Scott D GrosseNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Colleen M McBride
James P Evans
Muin J Khoury

Funding

Multiplex InitiativeZIAHG200344 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MC BRIDE, COLLEEN M · 2009 to 2013
$3.9M
Multiplex InitiativeZ01HG200344 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MC BRIDE, COLLEEN M · 2007 to 2008
$2.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HG200344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansInformation DisseminationPersonal Health Services

Identifiers

PMID19623080
PMCPMC3417335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.