Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19622390›Full record

ArticleHearing research2009

Alterations in the spontaneous discharge patterns of single units in the dorsal cochlear nucleus following intense sound exposure.

Paul G Finlayson, James A Kaltenbach

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tinnitus and event related potentials: a systematic review.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Kv3 KNeuropharmacology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Stimulation Strategies for Tinnitus Suppression in a Neuron Model.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul G FinlaysonDepartment of Otolaryngology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 5E-UHC, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. pfinlays@med.wayne.edu
James A Kaltenbach
Cleveland Clinic · USWayne State University · US

Funding

CENTRAL MECHANISMS RELATED TO TINNITUSR01DC003258 · NIDCD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KALTENBACH, JAMES A · 1999 to 2007
$2.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003258NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC03258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrophysiological recordings in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) were conducted to determine the nature of changes in single unit activity following intense sound exposure and how they relate to changes in multiunit activity. Single and multiunit spontaneous discharge rates and auditory response properties were recorded from the left DCN of tone exposed and control hamsters. The exposure condition consisted of a 10 kHz tone presented in the free-field at a level of 115 dB for 4h. Recordings conducted at 5-6 days post-exposure revealed several important changes. Increases in multiunit spontaneous neural activity were observed at surface and subsurface levels of the DCN of exposed animals, reaching a peak at intermediate depths corresponding to the fusiform cell layer and upper level of the deep layer. Extracellular spikes from single units in the DCN of both control and exposed animals characteristically displayed either M- or W-shaped waveforms, although the proportion of units with M-shaped spikes was higher in exposed animals than in controls. W-shaped spikes showed significant increases in the duration of their major peaks after exposure, suggestive of changes in the intrinsic membrane properties of neurons. Spike amplitudes were not found to be significantly increased in exposed animals. Spontaneous discharge rates of single units increased significantly from 8.7 spikes/s in controls to 15.9 spikes/s after exposure. Units with the highest activity in exposed animals displayed type III electrophysiological responses patterns, properties usually attributed to fusiform cells. Increases in spontaneous discharge rate were significantly larger when the comparison was limited to a subset of units having type III frequency response patterns. There was an increase in the incidence of simple spiking activity as well as in the incidence of spontaneous bursting activity, although the incidence of spikes occurring in bursts was low in both animal groups (i.e., <30%). Despite this low incidence, approximately half of the increase in spontaneous activity in exposed animals was accounted for by an increase in bursting activity. Finally, we found no evidence of an increase in the mean number of spontaneously active units in electrode penetrations of exposed animals compared to those in controls. Overall our results indicate that the increase in multiunit activity observed at the DCN surface reflects primarily an increase in the spontaneous discharge rates of single units below the DCN surface, of which approximately half was contributed by spikes in bursts. The highest level of hyperactivity was observed among units having the response properties most commonly attributed to fusiform cells.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemNeuronal PlasticitySynaptic TransmissionAnimalsAuditory PathwaysCochlear NucleusCricetinaeMaleMesocricetusTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID19622390
PMCPMC2778575
OpenAlexW2057853918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.