Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19621966›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2009

Physical basis of metal-binding specificity in Escherichia coli NikR.

Christine M Phillips, Paul S Nerenberg, Catherine L Drennan, Collin M Stultz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine M PhillipsDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Paul S Nerenberg
Catherine L Drennan
Collin M Stultz
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Complex Metallocluster Structure and AssemblyR01GM069857 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DRENNAN, CATHERINE L · 2004 to 2017
$3.1M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Escherichia coli and other bacteria, nickel uptake is regulated by the transcription factor NikR. Nickel binding at high-affinity sites in E. coli NikR (EcNikR) facilitates EcNikR binding to the nik operon, where it then suppresses transcription of genes encoding the nickel uptake transporter, NikABCDE. A structure of the EcNikR-DNA complex suggests that a second metal-binding site is also present when NikR binds to the nik operon. Moreover, this co-crystal structure raises the question of what metal occupies the second site under physiological conditions: K(+), which is present in the crystal structure, or Ni(2+), which has been proposed to bind to low- as well as high-affinity sites on EcNikR. To determine which ion is preferred at the second metal-binding site and the physical basis for any preference of one ion over another in both the second metal-binding site and the high-affinity sites, we conducted a series of detailed molecular simulations on the EcNikR structure. Simulations that place Ni(2+) at high-affinity sites lead to stable trajectories with realistic ion-ligand distances and geometries, while simulations that place K(+) at these sites lead to conformational changes in the protein that are likely unfavorable for ion binding. By contrast, simulations on the second metal site in the EcNikR-DNA complex lead to stable trajectories with realistic geometries regardless of whether K(+) or Ni(2+) occupies this site. Electrostatic binding free energy calculations, however, suggest that EcNikR binding to DNA is more favorable when the second metal-binding site contains K(+). An analysis of the energetic contributions to the electrostatic binding free energy suggests that, while the interaction between EcNikR and DNA is more favorable when the second site contains Ni(2+), the large desolvation penalty associated with moving Ni(2+) from solution to the relatively buried second site offsets this favorable interaction term. Additional free energy simulations that account for both electrostatic and non-electrostatic effects argue that EcNikR binding to DNA is most favorable when the second site contains a monovalent ion the size of K(+). Taken together, these data suggest that the EcNikR structure is most stable when Ni(2+) occupies high-affinity sites and that EcNikR binding to DNA is more favorable when the second site contains K(+).

Indexed as

Binding SitesChemical PhenomenaCrystallography, X-RayEscherichia coli ProteinsModels, MolecularNickelProtein Structure, TertiaryRepressor ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificityEscherichia coli ProteinsNickelNikR protein, E coliRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19621966
PMCPMC3579654
OpenAlexW1586591482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.