ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2009
Physical basis of metal-binding specificity in Escherichia coli NikR.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- ROS-induced allosteric modulation of NikR promotesVirulence · 2025Article
- Molecular Mechanism for Attractant Signaling to DHMA by E. coli Tsr.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Metal site occupancy and allosteric switching in bacterial metal sensor proteins.Archives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2012Review
- Searching for the Nik operon: how a ligand-responsive transcription factor hunts for its DNA binding site.Biochemistry · 2010Article
- Structural basis of low-affinity nickel binding to the nickel-responsive transcription factor NikR from Escherichia coli.Biochemistry · 2010Article
- Structural and mechanistic insights into Helicobacter pylori NikR activation.Nucleic acids research · 2010Article
- Apo and nickel-bound forms of the Pyrococcus horikoshii species of the metalloregulatory protein: NikR characterized by molecular dynamics simulations.Biochemistry · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In Escherichia coli and other bacteria, nickel uptake is regulated by the transcription factor NikR. Nickel binding at high-affinity sites in E. coli NikR (EcNikR) facilitates EcNikR binding to the nik operon, where it then suppresses transcription of genes encoding the nickel uptake transporter, NikABCDE. A structure of the EcNikR-DNA complex suggests that a second metal-binding site is also present when NikR binds to the nik operon. Moreover, this co-crystal structure raises the question of what metal occupies the second site under physiological conditions: K(+), which is present in the crystal structure, or Ni(2+), which has been proposed to bind to low- as well as high-affinity sites on EcNikR. To determine which ion is preferred at the second metal-binding site and the physical basis for any preference of one ion over another in both the second metal-binding site and the high-affinity sites, we conducted a series of detailed molecular simulations on the EcNikR structure. Simulations that place Ni(2+) at high-affinity sites lead to stable trajectories with realistic ion-ligand distances and geometries, while simulations that place K(+) at these sites lead to conformational changes in the protein that are likely unfavorable for ion binding. By contrast, simulations on the second metal site in the EcNikR-DNA complex lead to stable trajectories with realistic geometries regardless of whether K(+) or Ni(2+) occupies this site. Electrostatic binding free energy calculations, however, suggest that EcNikR binding to DNA is more favorable when the second metal-binding site contains K(+). An analysis of the energetic contributions to the electrostatic binding free energy suggests that, while the interaction between EcNikR and DNA is more favorable when the second site contains Ni(2+), the large desolvation penalty associated with moving Ni(2+) from solution to the relatively buried second site offsets this favorable interaction term. Additional free energy simulations that account for both electrostatic and non-electrostatic effects argue that EcNikR binding to DNA is most favorable when the second site contains a monovalent ion the size of K(+). Taken together, these data suggest that the EcNikR structure is most stable when Ni(2+) occupies high-affinity sites and that EcNikR binding to DNA is more favorable when the second site contains K(+).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.