Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19620962›Full record

Trial reportNature medicine2009

Baseline Ad5 serostatus does not predict Ad5 HIV vaccine-induced expansion of adenovirus-specific CD4+ T cells.

Natalie A Hutnick, Diane G Carnathan, Sheri A Dubey, George Makedonas, Kara S Cox, Lisa Kierstead, Sarah J Ratcliffe, Michael N Robertson, Danilo R Casimiro, Hildegund C J Ertl and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. COVID-19 vaccination and HIV-1 acquisition.Lancet (London, England) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Trained Immunity and Susceptibility to HIV.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Novel vaccine vectors for HIV-1.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Makedonas, George [added]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Natalie A HutnickDepartment of Microbiology and Center for AIDS Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Diane G Carnathan
Sheri A Dubey
George Makedonas
Kara S Cox
Lisa Kierstead
Sarah J Ratcliffe
Michael N Robertson
Danilo R Casimiro
Hildegund C J Ertl
Michael R Betts

Funding

Vector CoreU19AI074078 · NIAID · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI ERTL, HILDEGUND C. J. · 2007 to 2012
$17.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI074078NIAID NIH HHS U19AI074078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms underlying possible increased HIV-1 acquisition in adenovirus 5 (Ad5)-seropositive subjects vaccinated with Ad5-HIV-1 vectors in the Merck STEP trial remain unclear. We find that Ad5 serostatus does not predict Ad5-specific CD4(+) T cell frequency, and we did not observe durable significant differences in Ad5-specific CD4(+) T cells between Ad5-seropositive and Ad5-seronegative subjects after vaccination. These findings indicate no causative role for Ad5-specific CD4(+) T cells in increasing HIV-1 susceptibility in the STEP trial.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdenoviridaeAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, ViralCD4 Lymphocyte CountCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell ProliferationHIV-1HumansPrognosisT-Cell Antigen Receptor SpecificityVaccines, SyntheticAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, ViralVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID19620962
PMCPMC2723179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.