Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19620961›Full record

Trial reportNature medicine2009

Adenovirus-specific immunity after immunization with an Ad5 HIV-1 vaccine candidate in humans.

Kara L O'Brien, Jinyan Liu, Sharon L King, Ying-Hua Sun, Joern E Schmitz, Michelle A Lifton, Natalie A Hutnick, Michael R Betts, Sheri A Dubey, Jaap Goudsmit and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systems analysis of protective immune responses to RTS,S malaria vaccination in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Adenovirus-based vaccines-a platform for pandemic preparedness against emerging viral pathogens.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Current approaches to HIV vaccine development: a narrative review.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kara L O'BrienDivision of Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jinyan Liu
Sharon L King
Ying-Hua Sun
Joern E Schmitz
Michelle A Lifton
Natalie A Hutnick
Michael R Betts
Sheri A Dubey
Jaap Goudsmit
John W Shiver
Michael N Robertson
Danilo R Casimiro
Dan H Barouch
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USUnited States Military Academy · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Preclinical Evaluation of Novel Adenovirus Prime-Boost HIV-1 VaccineU19AI078526 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI DOLIN, RAPHAEL · 2008 to 2012
$44.0M
Preclinical Evaluation of Novel Adenovirus VectorsU19AI066305 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROUCH, DAN H. · 2005 to 2009
$19.8M
Vector CoreU19AI074078 · NIAID · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI ERTL, HILDEGUND C. J. · 2007 to 2012
$17.9M
T cell functionality and control of HIV infectionR01AI076066 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BETTS, MICHAEL R · 2008 to 2017
$4.6M
Novel Adenovirus Vaccine Vectors for HIV/SIVR01AI066924 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROUCH, DAN H. · 2006 to 2010
$3.5M
NIAID NIH HHS AI066305NIAID NIH HHS AI066924NIAID NIH HHS AI074078NIAID NIH HHS AI076066NIAID NIH HHS AI078526NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI066924NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI076066NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI066305NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI074078NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI078526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immunologic basis for the potential enhanced HIV-1 acquisition in adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5)-seropositive individuals who received the Merck recombinant Ad5 HIV-1 vaccine in the STEP study remains unclear. Here we show that baseline Ad5-specific neutralizing antibodies are not correlated with Ad5-specific T lymphocyte responses and that Ad5-seropositive subjects do not develop higher vector-specific cellular immune responses as compared with Ad5-seronegative subjects after vaccination. These findings challenge the hypothesis that activated Ad5-specific T lymphocytes were the cause of the potential enhanced HIV-1 susceptibility in the STEP study.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdenoviridaeAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, ViralAntibody SpecificityHIV-1HumansImmunizationInterferon-gammaT-Cell Antigen Receptor SpecificityT-LymphocytesVaccines, SyntheticAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, ViralInterferon-gammaVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID19620961
PMCPMC2756115
OpenAlexW2091843601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.