Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19619251›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2009

Social and economic costs of food allergies in Europe: development of a questionnaire to measure costs and health utility.

Margaret Fox, Jantine Voordouw, Miranda Mugford, Judith Cornelisse, Gerrit Antonides, Lynn Frewer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Investigating the health economic burden of atopic disease in children from the EAT-On Study.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025
    Article
  5. NOURISH-US: a mixed-methods, randomized crossover study of a program designed to reduce the financial burden of food allergy.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Article
  6. Cost-effectiveness of watchful waiting versus immediate emergency department transfer after epinephrine autoinjector use in Canada.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The excess costs of childhood food allergy on Canadian families: a cross-sectional study.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Margaret FoxUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. m.fox@uea.ac.uk
Jantine Voordouw
Miranda Mugford
Judith Cornelisse
Gerrit Antonides
Lynn Frewer
Wageningen University & Research · NLUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a questionnaire to measure the additional social costs of food allergies (FAs). DATA SOURCE AND STUDY

settingPeople with FAs and sampled members of the general population (with and without FAs) in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in 2006. STUDY

design(1) Literature review. (2) Focus group to identify key costs of FAs and seek views on the questionnaires. (3) Pilot survey to test the questionnaires in cases and controls. DATA COLLECTION: Twenty-eight participants in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands with clinically or self-diagnosed FAs took part in one of five focus groups. A case-control postal survey was conducted in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands (with 125 FA cases and 62 controls). PRINCIPAL

findingsMethods exist to measure social costs in chronic illness, but not FAs. Focus groups found features of FAs likely to impact costs of living. Pilot results suggest higher costs of living and health care costs, and well-being in FAs.

conclusionThe questionnaire is proposed for use in wider European and other comparative studies of FAs.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesChronic DiseaseEuropeFocus GroupsFood HypersensitivityHumansIncidencePilot ProjectsPrevalenceSeverity of Illness IndexTransportation

Identifiers

PMID19619251
PMCPMC2754553
OpenAlexW2090508233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.