Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19618812›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Engineering control technologies to reduce occupational silica exposures in masonry cutting and tuckpointing.

John D Meeker, Michael R Cooper, Daniel Lefkowitz, Pam Susi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Laboratory comparison of new high flow rate respirable size-selective sampler.Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A New Test Bench System for Hammer Drills: Validation for Handle Vibration.International journal of industrial ergonomics · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Interventions: advancing the state of the art.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John D MeekerDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 6635 SPH Tower, 109 S. Observatory St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. meekerj@umich.edu
Michael R Cooper
Daniel Lefkowitz
Pam Susi
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USCenter for Construction Research and Training · USNew Jersey Department of Health · US

Funding

Worker Electrical Inspection Pilot InterventionU54OH008307 · OH · CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION RES AND TRAINING · PI STAFFORD, ERICH J · 2004 to 2009
$15.1M
NIOSH CDC HHS OH008307NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH008307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA number of tasks in construction generate worker overexposures to respirable crystalline silica dust, which is a significant contributor to occupational mortality and morbidity. This study evaluated the performance of commercially available engineering controls used in dusty construction tasks commonly performed by bricklayers.

methodsLocal exhaust ventilation (LEV) controls for a portable abrasive cutter and for tuckpointing grinders were examined at a bricklayers' training center, as were two stationary wet saws. Personal breathing zone air samples were collected with and without the use of LEV or water suppression during simulated concrete block cutting, brick cutting, and tuckpointing.

resultsCompared with the use of no exposure control during block and brick cutting, the portable LEV unit significantly reduced mean respirable quartz exposures by 96% for block cutting and 91% for brick cutting (p < 0.01). The use of stationary wet saws was also associated with 91% reductions in exposure (p < 0.01). For tuckpointing, the reductions in mean respirable quartz concentrations were between 91% and 93% with the LEV controls (p < 0.05).

conclusionsReductions of up to 96% in mean respirable quartz concentration were observed between control and no-control scenarios. These reductions with commercially available off-the-shelf tools demonstrate the effectiveness of engineering control interventions to reduce crystalline silica exposures in construction. Strategies to further improve control performance and approaches for increasing control interventions in construction are needed.

Indexed as

Air Pollutants, OccupationalAir PollutionConstruction MaterialsDustEngineeringEquipment DesignEquipment SafetyHumansInhalation ExposureOccupational ExposureProtective DevicesSilicon DioxideSilicosisVentilationAir Pollutants, OccupationalDustSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID19618812
PMCPMC2708661
OpenAlexW1541945692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.