Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19618185›Full record

ReviewCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2010

Killer dendritic cells and their potential for cancer immunotherapy.

Nicolas Larmonier, Jennifer Fraszczak, Daniela Lakomy, Bernard Bonnotte, Emmanuel Katsanis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Immunotherapy for lung cancer: for whom the bell tolls?Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A new approach to reducing postsurgical cancer recurrence: perioperative targeting of catecholamines and prostaglandins.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolas LarmonierDepartment of Pediatrics, Steele Children's Research Center, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Ave., Tucson, AZ 85724-5073, USA. nrlarmon@email.arizona.edu
Jennifer Fraszczak
Daniela Lakomy
Bernard Bonnotte
Emmanuel Katsanis
Inserm · FRUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Immunotherapy for Chronic Myelogenous LeukemiaR01CA104926 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI KATSANIS, EMMANUEL · 2004 to 2013
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA104926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Known for years as the principal messengers of the immune system, dendritic cells (DC) represent a heterogeneous population of antigen presenting cells critically located at the nexus between innate and adaptive immunity. DC play a central role in the initiation of tumor-specific immune responses as they are endowed with the unique ability to take up, process and present tumor antigens to naïve CD4(+) or CD8(+) effector T lymphocytes. By virtue of the cytokines they produce, DC also regulate the type, strength and duration of T cell immune responses. In addition, they can participate in anti-tumoral NK and NKT cell activation and in the orchestration of humoral immunity. More recent studies have documented that besides their primary role in the induction and regulation of adaptive anti-tumoral immune responses, DC are also endowed with the capacity to directly kill cancer cells. This dual role of DC as killers and messengers may have important implications for tumor immunotherapy. First, the direct killing of malignant cells by DC may foster the release and thereby the immediate availability of specific tumor antigens for presentation to cytotoxic or helper T lymphocytes. Second, DC may participate in the effector phase of the immune response, potentially augmenting the diversity of the killing mechanisms leading to tumor elimination. This review focuses on this non-conventional cytotoxic function of DC as it relates to the promotion of cancer immunity and discusses the potential application of killer DC (KDC) in tumor immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Cytotoxicity, ImmunologicImmunotherapyAnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesDendritic CellsHumansKiller Cells, NaturalNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID19618185
PMCPMC11031008
OpenAlexW2007946871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.