Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19617391›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2009

Alteration of the ileal microbiota of weanling piglets by the growth-promoting antibiotic chlortetracycline.

Elizabeth Rettedal, Sébastien Vilain, Stacy Lindblom, Kelly Lehnert, Clay Scofield, Sajan George, Sharon Clay, Radhey S Kaushik, Artur J M Rosa, David Francis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Elizabeth RettedalDepartment of Biology and Microbiology, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota 57007, USA.
Sébastien Vilain
Stacy Lindblom
Kelly Lehnert
Clay Scofield
Sajan George
Sharon Clay
Radhey S Kaushik
Artur J M Rosa
David Francis
Volker S Brözel
South Dakota State University · USPlanta · RUUniversity of Veterinary Science · MM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotics such as chlortetracycline (CTC) have been used to promote growth of pigs for decades, but concerns over increased antibiotic-resistant infections in humans have prompted the development of alternative strategies. Developing alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) could be informed by information on the mechanisms of growth promotion, notably, how AGPs affect the microbial populations of the gastrointestinal tract. Pigs from three sows were aseptically delivered by cesarean section. Six piglets were distributed to each of two foster mothers until weaning, when piglets were fed a diet with or without 50 mg/kg CTC for 2 weeks. The ileal bacterial microbiota was characterized by using a cultivation-independent approach based on DNA extraction, PCR amplification, cloning, and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene pool. The ileal and mucosal communities of these growing pigs were dominated by Lactobacillus bacteria, various members of the family Clostridiaceae, and members of the poorly known genus Turicibacter. Overall, CTC treatment resulted in three shifts: a decrease in Lactobacillus johnsonii, an increase in L. amylovorus, and a decrease in Turicibacter phylotypes. The composition of the microbiota varied considerably between individual pigs, as revealed by shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and similarity (SONS) analysis (theta(YC) values). While the observed variation between untreated pigs obscured the possible effect of CTC, integral-LIBSHUFF and SONS analyses of pooled libraries indicated a significant shift due to CTC in both the lumen and the mucosa, with some OTUs unique to either treated or control ileum. DOTUR analysis revealed little overlap between control and treated communities at the 3% difference level, indicating unique ileal communities in the presence of CTC.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaChlortetracyclineCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalIleumIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsIntestinal MucosaMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsChlortetracyclineDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID19617391
PMCPMC2737922
OpenAlexW2138007699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.