Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19616031›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2009

Social features of scent-donor mice modulate scent marking of C57BL/6J recipient males.

Hiroyuki Arakawa, Keiko Arakawa, D Caroline Blanchard, Robert J Blanchard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The autism diagnosis in translation: shared affect in children and mouse models of ASD.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2011
    Review
  13. Mouse models of autism: testing hypotheses about molecular mechanisms.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroyuki ArakawaPacific Biosciences Research Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, United States. harakawa@binghamton.edu
Keiko Arakawa
D Caroline Blanchard
Robert J Blanchard
Pacific Biosciences (United States) · USUniversity of Hawaii System · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII SNRPU54NS039406 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI NICHOLS, ROBERT · 1999 to 2009
$14.4M
Parasympathetic Control of Right Ventricular FunctionU54NS039407 · NINDS · HOWARD UNIVERSITY · PI MACK, SERDIA O · 1999 to 2009
$13.2M
The Genetic Control of Social Behavior in the MouseR01MH081845 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI BLANCHARD, DIXIE CAROLINE · 2009 to 2012
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH081845NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS039406NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS039407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Territorial male mice can form familiarity-dependent amicable relationships, suggesting that they manage their territorial aggressiveness based on individual recognition, which may be mediated by olfactory signals. The present study demonstrated modulatory effect of odorant cues from mice of different social/housing groups on territorial scent marking by C57BL/6J males. Pair-housed males deposited few scent marks in a novel situation without mouse odors, while singly-housed males marked more in the same situation (Experiment 1). However, when confronted by a conspecific, singly-housed males made fewer marks to pair-housed than to singly-housed stimulus males, while pair-housed males showed few marks to either stimulus animal (Experiment 2). Reduction in scent marking in singly-housed males was also seen on exposure to urine scent alone from a pair-housed male, indicating that the inhibitory cue is mediated by urinary odor (Experiment 3). This inhibitory odor was effective even when singly-housed males were placed in a no-odor environment following exposure to soiled bedding used by pair-housed males (Experiment 4). When singly-housed males were exposed to scent from subordinate males, they showed less marking than when the stimulus scent was from dominants or singly-housed males (Experiment 5). Scent marking was not influenced by the total amount of urine scent marks deposited on the substrates (Experiment 6), suggesting that it is a particular component in urinary odor rather than the magnitude of the odor, that plays a significant role in recipient behavior. Together, these experiments indicate that conspecific male odor signals modulate territorial scent marking behavior in mice.

Indexed as

Olfactory PerceptionSocial BehaviorTerritorialityAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDominance-SubordinationEnvironmentHousing, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOdorantsPhysical StimulationRandom AllocationUrine

Identifiers

PMID19616031
PMCPMC2753713
OpenAlexW2071100348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.