Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19615530›Full record

ReviewAdvances in genetics2009

Genetic dissection of neural circuits and behavior in Mus musculus.

Robbert Havekes, Ted Abel

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Using Temporal Expectation to Assess Auditory Streaming in Mice.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Compartmentalized PDE4A5 Signaling Impairs Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity and Long-Term Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Genetic Strategies in the Study of Corticohippocampal Circuits.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. AKAPS act in a two-step mechanism of memory acquisition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robbert HavekesDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ted AbelDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Theta and Gamma Oscillations in Cortical MicrocircuitsP50MH064045 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUR, RAQUEL E · 2001 to 2010
$21.6M
Molecular Mechanisms of Long-Term Memory StorageR01MH060244 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ABEL, EDWIN TED G. · 2000 to 2010
$2.9M
NIMH NIH HHS P50MH6404501NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060244NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH60244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the major challenges in the field of neurobiology is to elucidate the molecular machinery that underlies the formation and storage of memories. For many decades, genetic studies in the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) have provided insight into the role of specific genes underlying memory storage. Although these pioneering studies were groundbreaking, a transition to a mammalian system more closely resembling the human brain is critical for the translation of basic research findings into therapeutic strategies in humans. Because the mouse (Mus musculus) shares the complex genomic and neuroanatomical organization of mammals and there is a wealth of molecular tools that are available to manipulate gene function in mice, the mouse has become the primary model for research into the genetic basis of mammalian memory. Another major advantage of mouse research is the ability to examine in vivo electrophysiological processes, such as synaptic plasticity and neuronal firing patterns during behavior (e.g., the analysis of place cell activity). The focus on mouse models for memory research has led to the development of sophisticated behavioral protocols capable of exploring the role of particular genes in distinct phases of learning and memory formation, which is one of the major accomplishments of the past decade. In this chapter, we will give an overview of several state of the art genetic approaches to study gene function in the mouse brain in a spatially and temporally restricted fashion.

Indexed as

Genetic ResearchModels, AnimalAnimalsBehaviorBrainGenes, DominantGene TargetingMiceNerve NetPharmacogenetics

Identifiers

PMID19615530
PMCPMC2861997
OpenAlexW100876624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.