ArticleBMC genomics2009
Identification of differentially expressed sense and antisense transcript pairs in breast epithelial tissues.
Article in BMC genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptional interference revisited.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- VECTOR: An Integrated Correlation Network Database for the Identification of CeRNA Axes in Uveal Melanoma.Genes · 2021Article
- Mechanisms of Antisense Transcription Initiation with Implications in Gene Expression, Genomic Integrity and Disease Pathogenesis.Non-coding RNA · 2019Review
- Natural Antisense Transcripts: Molecular Mechanisms and Implications in Breast Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Transcriptome-wide analysis of natural antisense transcripts shows their potential role in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Antisense RNA transcripts in the blood may be novel diagnostic markers for colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2017Article
- Characteristics of Antisense Transcript Promoters and the Regulation of Their Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Review
- Article
- Detection of natural antisense non-coding RNAs transcribed fromBiomedical reports · 2015Article
- Article
- Mechanisms of antisense transcription initiation from the 3' end of the GAL10 coding sequence in vivo.Molecular and cellular biology · 2013Article
- Gene expression profiling of sense and antisense transcripts in liver regeneration by microarray analysis.Biomedical reports · 2013Article
- Conserved expression of natural antisense transcripts in mammals.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Whole-transcriptome, high-throughput RNA sequence analysis of the bovine macrophage response to Mycobacterium bovis infection in vitro.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Strand-specific RNA-seq reveals widespread occurrence of novel cis-natural antisense transcripts in rice.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- Identification of potential antisense transcripts in rice using conventional microarray.Molecular biotechnology · 2012Article
- Long non-coding RNAs: versatile master regulators of gene expression and crucial players in cancer.American journal of translational research · 2012Article
- A systems biology approach identifies SART1 as a novel determinant of both 5-fluorouracil and SN38 drug resistance in colorectal cancer.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2012Article
- Comprehensive expressional analyses of antisense transcripts in colon cancer tissues using artificial antisense probes.BMC medical genomics · 2011Article
- The colorectal cancer disease-specific transcriptome may facilitate the discovery of more biologically and clinically relevant information.BMC cancer · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMore than 20% of human transcripts have naturally occurring antisense products (or natural antisense transcripts--NATs), some of which may play a key role in a range of human diseases. To date, several databases of in silico defined human sense-antisense (SAS) pairs have appeared, however no study has focused on differential expression of SAS pairs in breast tissue. We therefore investigated the expression levels of sense and antisense transcripts in normal and malignant human breast epithelia using the Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 and Almac Diagnostics Breast Cancer DSA microarray technologies as well as massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) data.
resultsThe expression of more than 2500 antisense transcripts were detected in normal breast duct luminal cells and in primary breast tumors substantially enriched for their epithelial cell content by DSA microarray. Expression of 431 NATs were confirmed by either of the other two technologies. A corresponding sense transcript could be identified on DSA for 257 antisense transcripts. Of these SAS pairs, 163 have not been previously reported. A positive correlation of differential expression between normal and malignant breast samples was observed for most SAS pairs. Orientation specific RT-QPCR of selected SAS pairs validated their expression in several breast cancer cell lines and solid breast tumours.
conclusionDisease-focused and antisense enriched microarray platforms (such as Breast Cancer DSA) confirm the assumption that antisense transcription in the human breast is more prevalent than previously anticipated. Expression of a proportion of these NATs has already been confirmed by other technologies while the true existence of the remaining ones has to be validated. Nevertheless, future studies will reveal whether the relative abundances of antisense and sense transcripts have regulatory influences on the translation of these mRNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.